|
1989 in a Day
|
|
Panels and Discussions
|
Aleksandra GłosAndrzej WaskiewiczHolly CaseIvan VejvodaKateryna RubanPhilipp TherVolodymyr KulykErhard Busek, Vuk Velebit, Ralf Beste, Dagmar Rychnovská, Georgi Pirinski, Jana Tsoneva, Jennifer Bergerova, Raluca Alexandrescu
|
|
Series: Panels and Discussions
|
Series: Panels and Discussions
|
|
30 Debata Tischnerowska
|
|
Panels and Discussions
|
Dariusz StolaAgata Bielik-Robson, Timothy Garton Ash, Aleksander Smolar
|
|
Speakers: Dariusz StolaAgata Bielik-Robson, Timothy Garton Ash, Aleksander Smolar
Series: Panels and Discussions
|
Speakers: Dariusz StolaAgata Bielik-Robson, Timothy Garton Ash, Aleksander Smolar
Series: Panels and Discussions
|
|
Dilemmas of Popular Sovereignty: Tocqueville’s Perspective
|
|
Seminars and Colloquia
|
Aishwary KumarEwa Atanassow
|
|
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
|
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
|
|
Freedom and Solidarity
|
|
Seminars and Colloquia
|
Piotr KubasiakWojciech Bonowicz
|
|
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
|
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
|
|
Historia i Prawda
|
|
Panels and Discussions
|
Marcin KrólTimothy Snyder
|
|
Series: Panels and Discussions
|
Series: Panels and Discussions
|
|
Junior Visiting Fellows' Conference Winter 2020
|
|
Conferences and Workshops
|
|
|
Speakers:
Series: Conferences and Workshops
|
Speakers:
Series: Conferences and Workshops
|
|
Junior Visiting Fellows’ Conference Summer 2021
|
|
Conferences and Workshops
|
Ayşe ÇağlarEzgican ÖzdemirIryna SklokinaJan VanaJul TirlerKatherine YoungerLudger HagedornMarci ShoreMariia HupaloMykhailo MartynenkoGabriela VicanovaKrystof DolezalRosario Forlenza, Dagmar Fink, Oley Kindiy, Costas Constantinou, Sina Farzin
|
|
Series: Conferences and Workshops
|
Series: Conferences and Workshops
|
|
Legacies of Silenced Atrocities: Lessons from Holodomor
|
|
Seminars and Colloquia
|
Karolina KoziuraKatherine YoungerLudger Hagedorn
|
|
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
|
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
|
|
Limits and Divisions of Human Histories
|
|
Lecture
|
Andrzej NowakKatherine YoungerLudger Hagedorn
|
|
Series: Lecture
The theory of history, as presented by Reinhart Koselleck (1923-2006), offers an intellectually tempting structure of three anthropological distinctions that prescribe figures of all possible histories (individual and collective): sooner or later, inside and outside, above and below. The first one signifies the span between being born and having to die, which makes every life unique and at the same time part of a particular generational experience. It could also be rendered as “old” and “new”. Uses of the second pair might be analysed as a contrast between public and private, or as a contemporary fear stemming from the contrast between “home” and “intruders”. The third pair Andrzej Nowak will try to “translate” not just in “master” and “slave” categories, but rather as “pupil” and “teacher”, or even “therapist” and “patient”. Nowak will try to read Koselleck’s structure in a perspective offered by spatial/temporal concepts of contemporary “Europe in progress” (or “Europe in crisis”), as well as in another, non-political perspective of esthetic renditions of the three above mentioned Koselleck’s abstract pairs ¬ in Andrzej Wajda’s “Birchwood” movie, the last scene of Richard Strauss’s “Rosenkavalier”, and in Philip Larkin’s poem: “An Arundel Tomb”. The question is whether love can be included into these conflicting pairs as a possible factor transcending their structures?
Read more
|
Series: Lecture
The theory of history, as presented by Reinhart Koselleck (1923-2006), offers an intellectually tempting structure of three anthropological distinctions that prescribe figures of all possible histories (individual and collective): sooner or later, inside and outside, above and below. The first one signifies the span between being born and having to die, which makes every life unique and at the same time part of a particular generational experience. It could also be rendered as “old” and “new”. Uses of the second pair might be analysed as a contrast between public and private, or as a contemporary fear stemming from the contrast between “home” and “intruders”. The third pair Andrzej Nowak will try to “translate” not just in “master” and “slave” categories, but rather as “pupil” and “teacher”, or even “therapist” and “patient”. Nowak will try to read Koselleck’s structure in a perspective offered by spatial/temporal concepts of contemporary “Europe in progress” (or “Europe in crisis”), as well as in another, non-political perspective of esthetic renditions of the three above mentioned Koselleck’s abstract pairs ¬ in Andrzej Wajda’s “Birchwood” movie, the last scene of Richard Strauss’s “Rosenkavalier”, and in Philip Larkin’s poem: “An Arundel Tomb”. The question is whether love can be included into these conflicting pairs as a possible factor transcending their structures?
Read more
|
|
Polish Politics of Memory and Poetics of Unlived Future
|
|
Seminars and Colloquia
|
Justyna TabaszewskaTimothy Snyder
|
|
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
|
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
|