|
Governance of Forced Migration in South Asia
|
|
Seminars and Colloquia
|
Ayşe ÇağlarSabyasachi Basu Ray Chaudhury
|
|
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
|
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
|
|
The Coloniality of Migration
|
|
Seminars and Colloquia
|
Ayşe ÇağlarPrem Kumar Rajaram
|
|
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
|
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
|
|
Grounding a ‘Geopolitical Europe’
|
|
Seminars and Colloquia
|
Ayşe ÇağlarLuiza BialasiewiczMisha Glenny
|
|
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
|
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
|
|
"Difficult to Settle" Refugees in Post-War Trieste
|
|
Seminars and Colloquia
|
Ayşe ÇağlarPamela Ballinger
|
|
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
|
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
|
|
Migration, Borders and Technologies – An Introduction to Techno-Borderscapes
|
|
Seminars and Colloquia
|
Ayşe ÇağlarGiorgia Donà
|
|
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
|
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
|
|
Forced Immobility and Forced Mobility During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Rethinking the Notion of Forced Migration
|
|
Seminars and Colloquia
|
Ayşe ÇağlarSandro Mezzadra
|
|
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
|
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
|
|
The “Migrant” in the Middle: How the Struggle for Decolonization and the Struggle against Fascism Are Linked
|
|
Seminars and Colloquia
|
Ayşe ÇağlarGregory Feldman
|
|
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
|
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
|
|
The Precarious Lives of Syrians: Temporary Protection and the Turkey/EU Deal
|
|
Seminars and Colloquia
|
Ayşe ÇağlarFeyzi Baban
|
Register here
|
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
|
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
|
|
Forced Migration, the Antinomies of Mobility, and the Autonomy of Asylum
|
|
Seminars and Colloquia
|
Ayşe ÇağlarNicholas de Genova
|
|
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
Rather than seeing the ever more devious reaction formations of border policing and militarization, migrant detention, immigration enforcement, and deportation by state powers as if these were purely a matter of control, it is instructive to situate this economy of power in relation to the primacy, autonomy, and subjectivity of human mobility on a global (transnational, intercontinental, cross- border, postcolonial) scale. This is true, I contend, as much for refugees as for those who come to be derisively designated to be mere “migrants.” If we start from the human freedom of movement and recognize the various tactics of bordering as reaction formations, then the various tactics of border policing and forms of migration governance can be seen to introduce interruptions that temporarily immobilize and decelerate human cross-border mobilities with the aim of subjecting them to processes of surveillance and adjudication. Indeed, it is this dialectic that reconstitutes these mobilities as something that comes to be apprehensible, alternately, as “migration,” or “asylum-seeking,” or the “forced migration” of “refugees” in flight from persecution or violence – which is to say, as one or another variety of target and object of government. Yet, even under the most restricted circumstances and under considerable constraint, these human mobilities exude a substantial degree of autonomous subjectivity whereby migrants and refugees struggle to appropriate mobility. Even against the considerable forces aligned to immobilize their mobility projects, or to subject them to the stringent and exclusionary rules and constrictions of asylum, the subjective autonomy of human mobility remains an incorrigible force.
Read more
|
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
Rather than seeing the ever more devious reaction formations of border policing and militarization, migrant detention, immigration enforcement, and deportation by state powers as if these were purely a matter of control, it is instructive to situate this economy of power in relation to the primacy, autonomy, and subjectivity of human mobility on a global (transnational, intercontinental, cross- border, postcolonial) scale. This is true, I contend, as much for refugees as for those who come to be derisively designated to be mere “migrants.” If we start from the human freedom of movement and recognize the various tactics of bordering as reaction formations, then the various tactics of border policing and forms of migration governance can be seen to introduce interruptions that temporarily immobilize and decelerate human cross-border mobilities with the aim of subjecting them to processes of surveillance and adjudication. Indeed, it is this dialectic that reconstitutes these mobilities as something that comes to be apprehensible, alternately, as “migration,” or “asylum-seeking,” or the “forced migration” of “refugees” in flight from persecution or violence – which is to say, as one or another variety of target and object of government. Yet, even under the most restricted circumstances and under considerable constraint, these human mobilities exude a substantial degree of autonomous subjectivity whereby migrants and refugees struggle to appropriate mobility. Even against the considerable forces aligned to immobilize their mobility projects, or to subject them to the stringent and exclusionary rules and constrictions of asylum, the subjective autonomy of human mobility remains an incorrigible force.
Read more
|
|
The Conundrum of Trafficking and Statelessness in West Bengal
|
|
Seminars and Colloquia
|
Ayşe ÇağlarPaula Banerjee
|
|
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
|
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
|