|
Degenerations of Democracy, Regenerations of Democracy
|
|
Panels and Discussions
|
Charles TaylorDilip GaonkarLudger HagedornShalini RanderiaCraig Calhoun, Mukulika Banerjee, Yogendra Yadav
|
|
Series: Panels and Discussions
|
Series: Panels and Discussions
|
|
Poland, Ukraine, Russia
|
|
Panels and Discussions
|
Adam Daniel RotfeldPawel MarczewskiShalini RanderiaChristian Ultsch
|
|
Series: Panels and Discussions
|
Series: Panels and Discussions
|
|
Wie steht es um die Verantwortung in einer digital-globalen Welt?
|
|
Panels and Discussions
|
Shalini RanderiaViola Raheb, Heide Schmidt, Renata Schmidtkunz
|
|
Series: Panels and Discussions
|
Series: Panels and Discussions
|
|
Angst und Angstmacherei
|
|
Other
|
Martin SchürzShalini RanderiaMisha Glenny
|
|
Series: Other
|
Series: Other
|
|
Spielarten des "sanften" Autoritarismus
|
|
Lecture
|
Dirk RupnowShalini RanderiaTilmann Märk
|
|
Series: Lecture
|
Series: Lecture
|
|
Does Capitalism Erode Democracy?
|
|
Lecture
|
Shalini RanderiaEva Illouz
|
|
Series: Lecture
“Does Capitalism erode Democracy?” Die israelische Soziologin Eva Illouz, die mit ihren Büchern über die Liebe im Konsumkapitalismus berühmt wurde, im Vortrag und Gespräch mit Johannes Kaup.
In ihren Büchern “Warum Liebe wehtut” und “Warum Liebe endet” zeigt Eva Illouz, wie durch Selbstoptimierung, Kommerzialisierung des Intimlebens und digitale Kommunikation das Gefühlsleben zutiefst verunsichert wird. In ihrem neuesten Buch “Das Glücksdiktat und wie es unser Leben beherrscht” kritisiert die Soziologin die boomende kapitalistische Glücksindustrie, die uns weismachen will, dass wir nur dann glücklich sein können, wenn wir unsere negativen Gefühle blockieren und uns selbst optimieren.
Im Anschluß an ihren Vortrag spricht Johannes Kaup mit Eva Illouz darüber, welche Faktoren zur Entfremdung zwischen Individuum, Gesellschaft und der Politik führen und welche Rolle dabei die neoliberal-kapitalistische Ideologie spielt, aber auch welche Möglichkeiten der Resilienz und des Widerstands es angesichts dieser Entwicklungen gibt.
Read more
|
Series: Lecture
“Does Capitalism erode Democracy?” Die israelische Soziologin Eva Illouz, die mit ihren Büchern über die Liebe im Konsumkapitalismus berühmt wurde, im Vortrag und Gespräch mit Johannes Kaup.
In ihren Büchern “Warum Liebe wehtut” und “Warum Liebe endet” zeigt Eva Illouz, wie durch Selbstoptimierung, Kommerzialisierung des Intimlebens und digitale Kommunikation das Gefühlsleben zutiefst verunsichert wird. In ihrem neuesten Buch “Das Glücksdiktat und wie es unser Leben beherrscht” kritisiert die Soziologin die boomende kapitalistische Glücksindustrie, die uns weismachen will, dass wir nur dann glücklich sein können, wenn wir unsere negativen Gefühle blockieren und uns selbst optimieren.
Im Anschluß an ihren Vortrag spricht Johannes Kaup mit Eva Illouz darüber, welche Faktoren zur Entfremdung zwischen Individuum, Gesellschaft und der Politik führen und welche Rolle dabei die neoliberal-kapitalistische Ideologie spielt, aber auch welche Möglichkeiten der Resilienz und des Widerstands es angesichts dieser Entwicklungen gibt.
Read more
|
|
Democracy - A Fragile Way of Life
|
|
Lecture
|
Shalini RanderiaTill van Rahden
|
|
Series: Lecture
After the Cold War ended, liberal democracy was taken for granted. Now it is in crisis: citizens distrust parliamentary politics, the people’s parties are losing members and votes, and social media are crowding out public debates. Challenging the sense of despair that informs recent studies on how democracy dies, Till van Rahden argued that it might prove more useful to explore what keeps it alive. A fruitful point of departure is the insight that democracy is not only a matter of elections and political parties, constitutions and parliaments, but is grounded in democratic experiences. The attention is less on how democratic government works, but on what equality, freedom, and justice feel like. A focus on democratic forms and aesthetics allows us to revisit the cultural and social foundations of democracy. No matter how stable a democracy may seem, it will wither and perish without ways of life that allow for and encourage democratic experiences.
Read more
|
Series: Lecture
After the Cold War ended, liberal democracy was taken for granted. Now it is in crisis: citizens distrust parliamentary politics, the people’s parties are losing members and votes, and social media are crowding out public debates. Challenging the sense of despair that informs recent studies on how democracy dies, Till van Rahden argued that it might prove more useful to explore what keeps it alive. A fruitful point of departure is the insight that democracy is not only a matter of elections and political parties, constitutions and parliaments, but is grounded in democratic experiences. The attention is less on how democratic government works, but on what equality, freedom, and justice feel like. A focus on democratic forms and aesthetics allows us to revisit the cultural and social foundations of democracy. No matter how stable a democracy may seem, it will wither and perish without ways of life that allow for and encourage democratic experiences.
Read more
|
|
Homo Itinerans
|
|
Lecture
|
Alessandro MonsuttiAyşe ÇağlarShalini Randeria
|
|
Series: Lecture
|
Series: Lecture
|
|
Beach Encounters
|
|
Lecture
|
Amade M'charekMieke VerlooShalini Randeria
|
|
Series: Lecture
|
Series: Lecture
|
|
Sphere of Influence I
|
|
Lecture
|
Shalini RanderiaStephen Kotkin
|
|
Series: Lecture
The liberal, rules-based international order did not take shape predominantly as a consequence of highmindedness, but as a sphere of influence. That, moreover, was to a great extent inspired, and sustained, by a comprehensive cold war with the Soviet Union (or Second World, as it was once called). The sphere of influence known as the West played a significant part in European integration, spurred phenomenal global investments in science and research, gave additional impetus to desegregation and civil rights in the U.S, and more.
Read more
|
Series: Lecture
The liberal, rules-based international order did not take shape predominantly as a consequence of highmindedness, but as a sphere of influence. That, moreover, was to a great extent inspired, and sustained, by a comprehensive cold war with the Soviet Union (or Second World, as it was once called). The sphere of influence known as the West played a significant part in European integration, spurred phenomenal global investments in science and research, gave additional impetus to desegregation and civil rights in the U.S, and more.
Read more
|