|
Radka Denemarková: Stunden aus Blei
|
|
Lecture
|
Ludger HagedornRadka Denemarková
|
Zur Anmeldung
|
Series: Lecture
|
Series: Lecture
|
|
Reflections on Mass Violence: War, Excess and Responsibility
|
|
Lecture
|
Ludger HagedornNergis Canefe
|
|
Series: Lecture
|
Series: Lecture
|
|
Religious Perspectives on Global Solidarity in the Era of Global Crises
|
|
Seminars and Colloquia
|
Clemena AntonovaLudger Hagedorn
|
|
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
All three global crises of recent times – the financial crisis of 2008, the refugee crisis, and now the coronavirus crisis – have been, among other things, tests of solidarity. But what is it that decides in a concrete situation, whether solidarity is extended to those in need or not? Especially interesting are those cases, when people feel forced to make difficult choices between solidarity to one group versus solidarity to another. The talk tried to distinguish between two concepts of solidarity, one that could be called civic solidarity (to one’s family, friends, compatriots, etc.) and another one offering a broader sense of global solidarity (to all human beings as such).
Read more
|
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
All three global crises of recent times – the financial crisis of 2008, the refugee crisis, and now the coronavirus crisis – have been, among other things, tests of solidarity. But what is it that decides in a concrete situation, whether solidarity is extended to those in need or not? Especially interesting are those cases, when people feel forced to make difficult choices between solidarity to one group versus solidarity to another. The talk tried to distinguish between two concepts of solidarity, one that could be called civic solidarity (to one’s family, friends, compatriots, etc.) and another one offering a broader sense of global solidarity (to all human beings as such).
Read more
|
|
Responsible AI
|
|
Lecture
|
Hannes WerthnerLudger HagedornRicardo Baeza-YatesGerti Kappel
|
|
Series: Lecture
|
Series: Lecture
|
|
Slavic Bazaar: Performances and Instrumentalizations of the Slavic discourse 1791 - 2017
|
|
Seminars and Colloquia
|
Katherine YoungerLudger HagedornTomáš Glanc
|
|
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
The ideology of Slavic unity and reciprocity has been a crucial pattern of European thought and culture since the beginning of the 19th century, and it is still relevant today.
In his presentation, Tomáš Glanc will discuss the development, the teleology, and the typologies of this heterogeneous discourse. The talk will outline performative practices of “Slaventum” rich in contradictions, geopolitical phantasms and geopoetic fictions. Glanc will use examples from different disciplines such as literature, art, linguistics, but also referring to political essays, institutional history, and the history of gymnastics.
Read more
|
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
The ideology of Slavic unity and reciprocity has been a crucial pattern of European thought and culture since the beginning of the 19th century, and it is still relevant today.
In his presentation, Tomáš Glanc will discuss the development, the teleology, and the typologies of this heterogeneous discourse. The talk will outline performative practices of “Slaventum” rich in contradictions, geopolitical phantasms and geopoetic fictions. Glanc will use examples from different disciplines such as literature, art, linguistics, but also referring to political essays, institutional history, and the history of gymnastics.
Read more
|
|
Social and Ecological Movements in “Apocalyptic Times”
|
|
Seminars and Colloquia
|
Adam RamsayLudger HagedornMatyáš Křížkovský
|
|
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
|
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
|
|
Sprache Macht Politik
|
|
Panels and Discussions
|
Ludger HagedornNelia VakhovskaThomas Weiler, Iryna Herasimovich, Sława Lisiecka, Lyuba Yakimchuk, Ursula Ebel, Manfred Müller
|
|
Series: Panels and Discussions
|
Series: Panels and Discussions
|
|
Telling History: On Creating the Polish History Museum and its Exhibitions
|
|
Seminars and Colloquia
|
Dariusz StolaLudger HagedornRobert Kostro
|
|
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
|
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
|
|
Tempering Power
|
|
Seminars and Colloquia
|
Adam SitzeLudger HagedornMartin Krygier
|
|
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
|
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
|
|
The Afghan Crisis Reconsidered
|
|
Seminars and Colloquia
|
Ludger HagedornNergis CanefePaula Banerjee
|
|
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
When the U.S. government announced its withdrawal from Afghanistan, the Afghan government folded, the president abandonend his people and the army surrendered to the Taliban. Many people, including the U.S. president looked askance at this development. Banerjee argues that such a development was hardly surprising. When the U.S. attacked Afghanistan, it was to create a client state that would protect U.S. interests, not those of Afghanistan or its neighbours. In fact, the nascent process of nation-building was halted. The US wanted to impose its values and most Afghans who went along with it did so out of self-interest. At best, the U.S. created a “creamy layer of collaborators” that in no way had deep rooted impact. When the U.S. left, there was nothing to hold the amorphous group together and they could not think of themselves as one nation. Many have fled, the others have surrendered to the Taliban, portraying clearly that it was never their war. Rather, it was another episode of the great game.
Nergis Canefe discussed the history of the Afghan refugee crisis that predates the withdrawal of the U.S. troops and the regional containment and redistribution of the dispossessed Afghan populations.
Read more
|
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
When the U.S. government announced its withdrawal from Afghanistan, the Afghan government folded, the president abandonend his people and the army surrendered to the Taliban. Many people, including the U.S. president looked askance at this development. Banerjee argues that such a development was hardly surprising. When the U.S. attacked Afghanistan, it was to create a client state that would protect U.S. interests, not those of Afghanistan or its neighbours. In fact, the nascent process of nation-building was halted. The US wanted to impose its values and most Afghans who went along with it did so out of self-interest. At best, the U.S. created a “creamy layer of collaborators” that in no way had deep rooted impact. When the U.S. left, there was nothing to hold the amorphous group together and they could not think of themselves as one nation. Many have fled, the others have surrendered to the Taliban, portraying clearly that it was never their war. Rather, it was another episode of the great game.
Nergis Canefe discussed the history of the Afghan refugee crisis that predates the withdrawal of the U.S. troops and the regional containment and redistribution of the dispossessed Afghan populations.
Read more
|