|
Inside Tyranny: Belarus and the Power and Non-power of State Terror
|
|
Panels and Discussions
|
Marci ShoreNataliya GumenyukTimothy SnyderMaryia Rohava, Aliaksei Kazharski, Radosław Sikorski, Hanna Komar
|
Series: Panels and Discussions
|
Series: Panels and Discussions
|
|
Polish Politics of Memory and Poetics of Unlived Future
|
|
Seminars and Colloquia
|
Justyna TabaszewskaTimothy Snyder
|
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
|
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
|
|
Emma Goldman Awards Ceremony
|
|
Other
|
Agata LisiakAkwugo Emejulu
|
Series: Other
|
Series: Other
|
|
Europe’s Futures Colloquium
|
|
Seminars and Colloquia
|
Ivan VejvodaOana Popescu-ZamfirWojciech Przybylski
|
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
|
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
|
|
Belarus ein Jahr nach den Massenprotesten: Wie weiter?
|
|
Panels and Discussions
|
Ivan VejvodaLudger HagedornOlga Shparaga
|
Series: Panels and Discussions
|
Series: Panels and Discussions
|
|
Europe's Futures Colloquium
|
|
Seminars and Colloquia
|
Amanda CoakleyZoran Nechev
|
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
|
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
|
|
Sites of Statelessness: Laws, Cities, Seas
|
-
|
Conferences and Workshops
|
Ayşe ÇağlarPaula BanerjeeRanabir SamaddarSabyasachi Basu Ray Chaudhury
|
-
Series: Conferences and Workshops
|
-
Series: Conferences and Workshops
|
|
Emma Goldman Awards Ceremony
|
|
Other
|
|
Speakers:
Series: Other
The IWM is proud to host the second Emma Goldman Awards ceremony, awarded since 2020 by the FLAX Foundation. These awards are given to talented and engaged scholars working on feminist and inequality issues in Europe, to support their research and development.
After a welcome by Ivan Vejvoda, acting rector of the IWM, the programme starts with two speeches. Agata Lisiak, former junior Fellow at the IWM and professor at Bard College Berlin, will talk on “Recalcitrant: Emma Goldman, Rosa Luxemburg, and the politics of waywardness”.
She is followed by a keynote Speech by professor Akwugo Emejulu, one of the inaugural Emma Goldman awardees, on “The Lonely Activist”.
The award ceremony is twofold, starting with presenting the seven 2020 Emma Goldman Snowball awardees, who had no earlier chance for a celebration due to COVID restrictions, and the seven new 2021 Emma Goldman awardees.
Read more
|
Speakers:
Series: Other
The IWM is proud to host the second Emma Goldman Awards ceremony, awarded since 2020 by the FLAX Foundation. These awards are given to talented and engaged scholars working on feminist and inequality issues in Europe, to support their research and development.
After a welcome by Ivan Vejvoda, acting rector of the IWM, the programme starts with two speeches. Agata Lisiak, former junior Fellow at the IWM and professor at Bard College Berlin, will talk on “Recalcitrant: Emma Goldman, Rosa Luxemburg, and the politics of waywardness”.
She is followed by a keynote Speech by professor Akwugo Emejulu, one of the inaugural Emma Goldman awardees, on “The Lonely Activist”.
The award ceremony is twofold, starting with presenting the seven 2020 Emma Goldman Snowball awardees, who had no earlier chance for a celebration due to COVID restrictions, and the seven new 2021 Emma Goldman awardees.
Read more
|
|
The Afghan Crisis Reconsidered
|
|
Seminars and Colloquia
|
Ludger HagedornNergis CanefePaula Banerjee
|
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
When the U.S. government announced its withdrawal from Afghanistan, the Afghan government folded, the president abandonend his people and the army surrendered to the Taliban. Many people, including the U.S. president looked askance at this development. Banerjee argues that such a development was hardly surprising. When the U.S. attacked Afghanistan, it was to create a client state that would protect U.S. interests, not those of Afghanistan or its neighbours. In fact, the nascent process of nation-building was halted. The US wanted to impose its values and most Afghans who went along with it did so out of self-interest. At best, the U.S. created a “creamy layer of collaborators” that in no way had deep rooted impact. When the U.S. left, there was nothing to hold the amorphous group together and they could not think of themselves as one nation. Many have fled, the others have surrendered to the Taliban, portraying clearly that it was never their war. Rather, it was another episode of the great game.
Nergis Canefe discussed the history of the Afghan refugee crisis that predates the withdrawal of the U.S. troops and the regional containment and redistribution of the dispossessed Afghan populations.
Read more
|
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
When the U.S. government announced its withdrawal from Afghanistan, the Afghan government folded, the president abandonend his people and the army surrendered to the Taliban. Many people, including the U.S. president looked askance at this development. Banerjee argues that such a development was hardly surprising. When the U.S. attacked Afghanistan, it was to create a client state that would protect U.S. interests, not those of Afghanistan or its neighbours. In fact, the nascent process of nation-building was halted. The US wanted to impose its values and most Afghans who went along with it did so out of self-interest. At best, the U.S. created a “creamy layer of collaborators” that in no way had deep rooted impact. When the U.S. left, there was nothing to hold the amorphous group together and they could not think of themselves as one nation. Many have fled, the others have surrendered to the Taliban, portraying clearly that it was never their war. Rather, it was another episode of the great game.
Nergis Canefe discussed the history of the Afghan refugee crisis that predates the withdrawal of the U.S. troops and the regional containment and redistribution of the dispossessed Afghan populations.
Read more
|
|
Europe's Futures Colloquium
|
|
Seminars and Colloquia
|
Ivan VejvodaJanka OertelOlivia Lazard
|
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
|
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
|