|
Ein Wir in Vielen Namen
|
|
Lecture
|
Ludger HagedornOlesya YaremchukMaria Weissenböck
|
|
Series: Lecture
|
Series: Lecture
|
|
The Impossibility of Politics: Brecht, Manto and Two Itinerant Situations
|
|
Lecture
|
Ludger HagedornRanabir Samaddar
|
|
Series: Lecture
|
Series: Lecture
|
|
Consolation: Art and Ritual
|
|
Lecture
|
Richard SennettLudger Hagedorn
|
|
Series: Lecture
|
Series: Lecture
|
|
Identität, Diversität, Postkolonialismus: Neue Herausforderungen für das Übersetzen von Literatur
|
|
Lecture
|
Ludger HagedornLutz KlicheMichael KeglerSusann Urban
|
|
Series: Lecture
|
Series: Lecture
|
|
Limits of Machines, Limits of Humans
|
|
Lecture
|
Edward LeeLudger HagedornStefan Woltran, Gerti Kappel, Michael Wiesmüller
|
|
Series: Lecture
|
Series: Lecture
|
|
The Death and Rebirth of Democratic Internationalism: Controversies and Possibilities
|
|
Lecture
|
Claus OffeLudger HagedornMicheline Ishay
|
|
Series: Lecture
|
Series: Lecture
|
|
Beyond the Leader: Looking at Grassroots Reasons for the Rise of Illiberalism
|
|
Lecture
|
Ludger HagedornMarlene Laruelle
|
I want to attend
|
Series: Lecture
|
Series: Lecture
|
|
Philosophy, Sacrifice, and War: Problems and Ambiguities
|
|
Lecture
|
James DoddLudger Hagedorn
|
|
Series: Lecture
|
Series: Lecture
|
|
Responsible AI
|
|
Lecture
|
Hannes WerthnerLudger HagedornRicardo Baeza-YatesGerti Kappel
|
|
Series: Lecture
|
Series: Lecture
|
|
Limits and Divisions of Human Histories
|
|
Lecture
|
Andrzej NowakKatherine YoungerLudger Hagedorn
|
|
Series: Lecture
The theory of history, as presented by Reinhart Koselleck (1923-2006), offers an intellectually tempting structure of three anthropological distinctions that prescribe figures of all possible histories (individual and collective): sooner or later, inside and outside, above and below. The first one signifies the span between being born and having to die, which makes every life unique and at the same time part of a particular generational experience. It could also be rendered as “old” and “new”. Uses of the second pair might be analysed as a contrast between public and private, or as a contemporary fear stemming from the contrast between “home” and “intruders”. The third pair Andrzej Nowak will try to “translate” not just in “master” and “slave” categories, but rather as “pupil” and “teacher”, or even “therapist” and “patient”. Nowak will try to read Koselleck’s structure in a perspective offered by spatial/temporal concepts of contemporary “Europe in progress” (or “Europe in crisis”), as well as in another, non-political perspective of esthetic renditions of the three above mentioned Koselleck’s abstract pairs ¬ in Andrzej Wajda’s “Birchwood” movie, the last scene of Richard Strauss’s “Rosenkavalier”, and in Philip Larkin’s poem: “An Arundel Tomb”. The question is whether love can be included into these conflicting pairs as a possible factor transcending their structures?
Read more
|
Series: Lecture
The theory of history, as presented by Reinhart Koselleck (1923-2006), offers an intellectually tempting structure of three anthropological distinctions that prescribe figures of all possible histories (individual and collective): sooner or later, inside and outside, above and below. The first one signifies the span between being born and having to die, which makes every life unique and at the same time part of a particular generational experience. It could also be rendered as “old” and “new”. Uses of the second pair might be analysed as a contrast between public and private, or as a contemporary fear stemming from the contrast between “home” and “intruders”. The third pair Andrzej Nowak will try to “translate” not just in “master” and “slave” categories, but rather as “pupil” and “teacher”, or even “therapist” and “patient”. Nowak will try to read Koselleck’s structure in a perspective offered by spatial/temporal concepts of contemporary “Europe in progress” (or “Europe in crisis”), as well as in another, non-political perspective of esthetic renditions of the three above mentioned Koselleck’s abstract pairs ¬ in Andrzej Wajda’s “Birchwood” movie, the last scene of Richard Strauss’s “Rosenkavalier”, and in Philip Larkin’s poem: “An Arundel Tomb”. The question is whether love can be included into these conflicting pairs as a possible factor transcending their structures?
Read more
|