|
Fleeing and Staying
|
|
Lecture
|
Meghna Guhathakurta, Sabyasachi Basu Ray Chaudhury
|
|
Speakers: Meghna Guhathakurta, Sabyasachi Basu Ray Chaudhury
Series: Lecture
|
Speakers: Meghna Guhathakurta, Sabyasachi Basu Ray Chaudhury
Series: Lecture
|
|
Forced Immobility and Forced Mobility During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Rethinking the Notion of Forced Migration
|
|
Seminars and Colloquia
|
Ayşe ÇağlarSandro Mezzadra
|
|
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
|
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
|
|
Forced Migration, the Antinomies of Mobility, and the Autonomy of Asylum
|
|
Seminars and Colloquia
|
Ayşe ÇağlarNicholas de Genova
|
|
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
Rather than seeing the ever more devious reaction formations of border policing and militarization, migrant detention, immigration enforcement, and deportation by state powers as if these were purely a matter of control, it is instructive to situate this economy of power in relation to the primacy, autonomy, and subjectivity of human mobility on a global (transnational, intercontinental, cross- border, postcolonial) scale. This is true, I contend, as much for refugees as for those who come to be derisively designated to be mere “migrants.” If we start from the human freedom of movement and recognize the various tactics of bordering as reaction formations, then the various tactics of border policing and forms of migration governance can be seen to introduce interruptions that temporarily immobilize and decelerate human cross-border mobilities with the aim of subjecting them to processes of surveillance and adjudication. Indeed, it is this dialectic that reconstitutes these mobilities as something that comes to be apprehensible, alternately, as “migration,” or “asylum-seeking,” or the “forced migration” of “refugees” in flight from persecution or violence – which is to say, as one or another variety of target and object of government. Yet, even under the most restricted circumstances and under considerable constraint, these human mobilities exude a substantial degree of autonomous subjectivity whereby migrants and refugees struggle to appropriate mobility. Even against the considerable forces aligned to immobilize their mobility projects, or to subject them to the stringent and exclusionary rules and constrictions of asylum, the subjective autonomy of human mobility remains an incorrigible force.
Read more
|
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
Rather than seeing the ever more devious reaction formations of border policing and militarization, migrant detention, immigration enforcement, and deportation by state powers as if these were purely a matter of control, it is instructive to situate this economy of power in relation to the primacy, autonomy, and subjectivity of human mobility on a global (transnational, intercontinental, cross- border, postcolonial) scale. This is true, I contend, as much for refugees as for those who come to be derisively designated to be mere “migrants.” If we start from the human freedom of movement and recognize the various tactics of bordering as reaction formations, then the various tactics of border policing and forms of migration governance can be seen to introduce interruptions that temporarily immobilize and decelerate human cross-border mobilities with the aim of subjecting them to processes of surveillance and adjudication. Indeed, it is this dialectic that reconstitutes these mobilities as something that comes to be apprehensible, alternately, as “migration,” or “asylum-seeking,” or the “forced migration” of “refugees” in flight from persecution or violence – which is to say, as one or another variety of target and object of government. Yet, even under the most restricted circumstances and under considerable constraint, these human mobilities exude a substantial degree of autonomous subjectivity whereby migrants and refugees struggle to appropriate mobility. Even against the considerable forces aligned to immobilize their mobility projects, or to subject them to the stringent and exclusionary rules and constrictions of asylum, the subjective autonomy of human mobility remains an incorrigible force.
Read more
|
|
Governance of Forced Migration in South Asia
|
|
Seminars and Colloquia
|
Ayşe ÇağlarSabyasachi Basu Ray Chaudhury
|
|
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
|
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
|
|
Grounding a ‘Geopolitical Europe’
|
|
Seminars and Colloquia
|
Ayşe ÇağlarLuiza BialasiewiczMisha Glenny
|
|
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
|
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
|
|
Innovative Methods of Research in Migration & Refugee Studies
|
|
Panels and Discussions
|
Ayşe ÇağlarSandro Mezzadra, Giorgio Grappi, Lydia Potts
|
|
Speakers: Ayşe ÇağlarSandro Mezzadra, Giorgio Grappi, Lydia Potts
Series: Panels and Discussions
|
Speakers: Ayşe ÇağlarSandro Mezzadra, Giorgio Grappi, Lydia Potts
Series: Panels and Discussions
|
|
Keywords in Refugee and Migration Studies - Day 1
|
|
Conferences and Workshops
|
Ranabir SamaddarAyşe ÇağlarMartina Tazzioli, Federico Rahola, Shahram Khosravi
|
|
Series: Conferences and Workshops
|
Series: Conferences and Workshops
|
|
Keywords in Refugee and Migration Studies - Day 2
|
|
Conferences and Workshops
|
Paula BanerjeeSom NiroulaSandro Mezzadra, Manuela Bojadžijev, Marie-Caroline Saglio-Yatzimirsky, Nagehan Uskan
|
|
Series: Conferences and Workshops
|
Series: Conferences and Workshops
|
|
Migrants and Roads
|
|
Conferences and Workshops
|
|
|
Speakers:
Series: Conferences and Workshops
|
Speakers:
Series: Conferences and Workshops
|
|
Migration, Borders and Technologies – An Introduction to Techno-Borderscapes
|
|
Seminars and Colloquia
|
Ayşe ÇağlarGiorgia Donà
|
|
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
|
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
|