|
Putin’s Memory War. Russia’s Battles over the History of World War II
|
|
Lecture
|
Clemena AntonovaSergei MedvedevTimothy Snyder
|
|
Series: Lecture
|
Series: Lecture
|
|
Reading Russian Philosophy in the Age of Putin
|
|
Lecture
|
Clemena AntonovaGeorge PattisonChristoph Schneider, Diana Dukhanova
|
|
Series: Lecture
|
Series: Lecture
|
|
Reading Russian Philosophy in the Age of Putin
|
|
Lecture
|
Clemena AntonovaMischa GabowitschTatyana Gershkovich, Ivan Foletti
|
|
Series: Lecture
|
Series: Lecture
|
|
Reading Russian Philosophy in the Age of Putin
|
|
Lecture
|
Clemena AntonovaNikolay MitrokhinSerguei OushakineRandall A. Poole, Dessy Gavrilova
|
REGISTRATION
|
Series: Lecture
|
Series: Lecture
|
|
Red Platonism? Kazimir Malevich and Russian Religious Philosophy
|
|
Seminars and Colloquia
|
Clemena AntonovaTatiana Levina
|
|
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
|
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
|
|
Religion and Revolution
|
|
Lecture
|
Clemena AntonovaGayle Lonergan
|
|
Series: Lecture
While the “Russian religious renaissance” at the beginning of the 20th century and the political fervour, which culminated in the October Revolution of 1917, took place at the same period, these two developments are rarely studied alongside each other. In their joint book presentations, the two speakers considered a tradition of religious philosophy, on the one hand and the political history of the early years of the Bolshevik Party, on the other as two responses to the crisis of modernity. Interestingly, with all their differences, the religious and the Marxist-Leninist projects – both of which displayed utopian and illiberal features – shared common concerns and themes. It is, thus, not surprising that some of the most prominent religious thinkers had started as Marxists. It is exactly these common themes that can be relevant to contemporary debates on the critical issues of the early 21st century.
Read more
|
Series: Lecture
While the “Russian religious renaissance” at the beginning of the 20th century and the political fervour, which culminated in the October Revolution of 1917, took place at the same period, these two developments are rarely studied alongside each other. In their joint book presentations, the two speakers considered a tradition of religious philosophy, on the one hand and the political history of the early years of the Bolshevik Party, on the other as two responses to the crisis of modernity. Interestingly, with all their differences, the religious and the Marxist-Leninist projects – both of which displayed utopian and illiberal features – shared common concerns and themes. It is, thus, not surprising that some of the most prominent religious thinkers had started as Marxists. It is exactly these common themes that can be relevant to contemporary debates on the critical issues of the early 21st century.
Read more
|
|
Religious Perspectives on Global Solidarity in the Era of Global Crises
|
|
Seminars and Colloquia
|
Clemena AntonovaLudger Hagedorn
|
|
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
All three global crises of recent times – the financial crisis of 2008, the refugee crisis, and now the coronavirus crisis – have been, among other things, tests of solidarity. But what is it that decides in a concrete situation, whether solidarity is extended to those in need or not? Especially interesting are those cases, when people feel forced to make difficult choices between solidarity to one group versus solidarity to another. The talk tried to distinguish between two concepts of solidarity, one that could be called civic solidarity (to one’s family, friends, compatriots, etc.) and another one offering a broader sense of global solidarity (to all human beings as such).
Read more
|
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
All three global crises of recent times – the financial crisis of 2008, the refugee crisis, and now the coronavirus crisis – have been, among other things, tests of solidarity. But what is it that decides in a concrete situation, whether solidarity is extended to those in need or not? Especially interesting are those cases, when people feel forced to make difficult choices between solidarity to one group versus solidarity to another. The talk tried to distinguish between two concepts of solidarity, one that could be called civic solidarity (to one’s family, friends, compatriots, etc.) and another one offering a broader sense of global solidarity (to all human beings as such).
Read more
|
|
Reverse Perspective, the Politics of Space, and Contemporary Art Practice
|
|
Panels and Discussions
|
Clemena AntonovaTomáš GlancWim Goes, Volkmar Mühleis
|
|
Series: Panels and Discussions
|
Series: Panels and Discussions
|
|
Rule by Law and the Making of Ethno-Democracies
|
|
Seminars and Colloquia
|
Clemena AntonovaRajshree ChandraDimitry Kochenov
|
|
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
|
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
|
|
Sex/Gender in the Brain: Critical Notes on fMRI-Studies
|
|
Seminars and Colloquia
|
Anelis Kaiser TrujilloClemena Antonova
|
|
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
|
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
|