Students Take Bulgaria’s Protests to the Next Level. Can They Break the Political Stalemate?

Students taking part in the protests

Since late October, Bulgarian students, demanding the resignation of the government, have occupied and blockaded lecture halls at universities in Sofia and beyond.[1] The students’ actions have come following more than four months of continuous anti-government demonstrations which were provoked by the cynicism of the country’s political class and its perceived endorsement of widespread state-sponsored corruption. The current government prefers to act as if the protest movement simply does not exist. As a result the situation has evolved into a stalemate between the government and its supporters on the one hand and, on the other, the thousands of people who have been taking to the streets demanding not only its resignation, but a basic level of adherence to moral principles and accountability from the political elite as such. Throughout modern history student protest movements have often been a factor and catalyst in political change. The outbreak of the student occupation movement in Bulgaria can prove once again that students as a group can influence the political and historical course of nations and countries.


The Context Behind the Student Protest

The demonstrations that have taken place throughout the summer in Bulgaria are the second wave of anti-government protests in one year. Earlier this year, in February, tens of thousands of protesters took to the streets infuriated by energy price hikes atop of enduring poverty, unemployment, and corruption. The protests saw their tragic highlights when seven people committed desperate acts of self-immolation. Under public pressure, the centre-right government of former Prime Minister Boyko Borisov resigned in disgrace leading to early elections. The outcome of the elections, however, proved a conundrum as both Borisov’s populist party, Citizens for the European Development of Bulgaria (GERB), and the post-communist Bulgarian Socialist Party, won a near-equal share of the vote thereby cancelling out any prospect of a sound coalition. In order to exclude GERB from power, a minority government under Plamen Oresharski was formed by the Socialists and the party of ethnic Turks with the silent but necessary support of Ataka, an extremist right-wing and xenophobic party, as it was the only other party that had managed to get representatives elected to the National Assembly. It was an improbable alliance that hardly heralded any possible improvement compared to the previous government.

The occupied Rectorate of Sofia University

Against this backdrop, as if to challenge fate, with Bulgaria’s political establishment already disreputed for its cronyist practices and shady links to criminal milieux, the coalition underpinning the newly-minted government of Prime Minister Oresharski wasted no time to appoint Delyan Peevski, a notorious media mogul, as head of state security. Almost immediately, thousands of Bulgarians, spurred on by social media, took to the streets in Sofia to protest against the appointment of Mr Peevski. The appointment was swiftly repealed, but the protests continued with demonstrators promptly demanding the resignation of the government. More so, the protesters, galvanised as they were by the perceived arrogance of the new Socialist-led government, were no longer merely demonstrating against the incumbents. As Bulgarian political analyst Ivan Krastev pointed out during the summer, the protest became directed not just against this government, but “against any government that treats people as useless furniture.”[2] Furthermore, there seems to be no end to the endemic scandals of corruption among the political elite. At the time of writing this article, the deputy speaker of parliament, Hristo Biserov, had just resigned from all his posts and presumably fled the country following allegations of document forgery, tax fraud, and money laundering.[3] According to Bulgarian cultural expert, Aleksander Kiossev, who himself has been taking part in the protests, the general feeling of resentment towards all political parties is merely the logical consequence of the fact that people’s patience with the political establishment has run out, overstretched not only by this government but also the previous ones.[4]

Surprisingly, barring one incident of violent escalation in July when demonstrators attempted to prevent members of parliament from leaving the parliament building, the protests have been a carnivalesque and non-violent phenomenon in the form of daily colourful gatherings of thousands of people chanting ‘O-STAV-KA’ [resignation] in front of the Council of Ministers and the Parliament. However, the Oresharski government has chosen to weather the storm and instead of resigning, government officials and ruling party members have either ignored the protesters or relied on paid counter-protesters sent in from the countryside hoping that the summer holiday season would in the meantime wear down the demonstrators’ resolve. While some observers optimistically hailed the supposed mobilising influence of social media or the global impact of simultaneous occurrences of protest in Turkey, Brazil, and elsewhere, as the motive force driving the protest in Sofia, the government’s strategy actually seemed to show signs of success as the number of protesters in Sofia gradually started to dwindle.[5]

Students Take the Initiative

Students debate problems in auditorium 272

However, things changed on 23 October when students at Sofia’s St Kliment Ohridski University initiated a sit-in strike in the university’s largest lecture hall, auditorium 272. On that day, a lecture had been scheduled to be given by Dimitar Tokushev, a law professor and the chairman of Bulgaria’s Constitutional Court. A few days earlier, the court had ruled to reinstate the infamous Mr. Peevski as a member of parliament following the repeal of his appointment as head of state security. It was a ruling that sparked outrage and disbelief – as symbolised by a later anonymous offering of the court on eBay describing it as “most useful for mafia members, kingpins or corrupted members of parliament.”[6] It thus could have hardly been surprising for Tokushev not to expect his students, some of whom presumably were taking part in the protests, to inquire about the court’s decision. However, when he was confronted with a barrage of students’ questions relating to the ruling, he refused to respond and instead fled the auditorium. In reaction, the students staged a sit-in strike demanding answers to their questions seeing it as their moral right. While their initial appeal for an explanation of the legal grounds of the court’s decision went unheeded, news of the sit-in spread, encouraging the agitated students to proclaim an open-ended occupation of the university’s main building, commonly referred to as the Rectorate, where auditorium 272 is located. The students rapidly organised themselves agreeing on some basic rules of conduct for the duration of the occupation and, echoing the demonstrations on the streets, declared the resignation of the Oresharski government as their objective. Within 24 hours of Tokushev’s ill-fated flight of the auditorium, the movement referred to in the social media environment as #Occupy272 and #OccupySU was born.[7]

Gergana Dineva

Student leaders

Since then, the student occupation movement has spread to more universities in Sofia with other academic centres from the Black Sea coast to the banks of the Danube following the capital’s example. At the time of writing, the student occupation movement involves 15 institutions of higher education. From the initial small group of first-hour occupiers of auditorium 272, a nationwide organised student movement under the name Ranobudnite Studenti [Early Rising Students] is emerging that has poised itself against the cynicism of the political elite. Its centre of gravity remains located in the main building of Sofia University where student leaders like Ivaylo Dinev, who meanwhile have become widely recognisable personalities, coordinate the actions of the broader movement. Though the students have blockaded themselves within the confines of the Rectorate, they can count on much sympathy among the university’s faculty, who as Gergana Dineva, Assistant Professor in Mediaeval Philosophy at Sofia University, explains “are trying to support the students in various ways, from organising debates and lectures to writing open letters, critical articles and official declarations.”[8] It is not only in Sofia where the support of the professoriate is apparent, as Dineva points out: “On 28 October we issued a declaration of support for student protesters where we unequivocally state that we take a firm stand behind our students’ demands for the resignation of the government of Mr. Oresharski, the immediate dissolution of the National Assembly, and the calling of early elections. The declaration has meanwhile been signed by more than 600 Bulgarian professors.”

Officially though, the university’s highest collegial authority, the Academic Council, has taken a more reserved stance. Its declaration on 28 October reads: “The Academic Council understands and supports the motives of students who occupied the building of the Rectorate, as a reaction against the lack of morality in political life, the absence of concern for the future of young people in the country and the disrespect for their positions. We are convinced not only that the young people are right but that they should be encouraged to express a civic position.” However, the Council does not support the occupation as such: “We appeal to the organisers and participants in the occupation to search for other forms of protest that do not obstruct the University to fulfil its mission.”[9] Despite the Council’s appeal it has not called for measures to end the occupation nor have the university’s authorities undertaken any steps to do so, thus de facto allowing the occupation to continue.

The Students Impart a New Dynamic on the Protest

With their occupation, the students have not only joined forces with the broader protest movement, but given it a more permanent dimension adding more visibility to the demands with their banners flying from the university’s windows for all passers-by to see.

Students invoke past movements

Though the students see the occupation as a specific and separate student protest action, acts of solidarity with the broader movement is an active part of the occupation. The anti-government protesters on the streets were quick to acknowledge the significance of the student occupation making gatherings in front of the Rectorate to support the students part of their now daily protest routine. Groups of student occupiers then also go and take part in the street demonstrations.[10] Students have also undertaken some flashmob-type protest actions beyond the universities’ premises such as temporarily blocking traffic at nearby intersections. Students from the National Academy for Theatre and Film Arts have regularly staged theatrical street performances in addition to joining the occupation.[11] But one of the most prolific student actions took place a few days before the outbreak of occupation, when a small group of student protesters entered the main hall of the parliament and unveiled a banner stating “Are you not ashamed of yourselves?” in front of the gathered MPs and the cameras of the national television. Though their banner was quickly taken down, the students were not arrested but instead invited for a talk with the speaker of parliament, Mihail Mikov. The latter’s open-hearted frankness left a lasting impression when he told the students that he doesn’t “care about the opinion of the people, not of those who are protesting, not of those who are silent, not of those who elected him.”[12] While Mikov can be complimented for his honesty, such displays of cynicism from the country’s political class and their contempt for the people whose representatives they supposedly are, only underline what the students are struggling against. The students who unveiled the banner in the Parliament are in fact those who initiated the occupation.

For more than four months the government has not been moved by the protest on the street, but the occupation strike at the universities could change that. The students’ actions have the potential to break the stalemate between the hitherto non-organised protest movement and the intransigence of the government for a number of reasons. Despite the closed character of the occupation strike, its nerve centre, the university’s main building, is located on the main avenue where the daily demonstrations take place. Since the beginning of the occupation, protesters have gathered there in support of the students. The latter thus provided a new incentive to mobilise, while the occupation leaders have emerged as spokesmen and faces of the protest. Symbolising the young generation, the students are also sending an important message to the broader public. As a group they have chosen to stand their ground together instead of individually seeking better fortunes at home or abroad. Their actions and protest have resonated beyond the academic milieu as even some of Sofia’s older citizens prepare home-cooked meals for the occupiers.

Friendship Networks Are Crucial for the Movement

Apart from reinvigorating the protests, the students have provided the movement with a potential coordinated organisational network and structure. While they make use of social media as a grassroots information source to spread news about the movement, the occupiers’ level of organisation is beyond anything achievable via twitter or facebook. The students set up their own volunteer watchmen in the occupied buildings, prohibited alcohol use, and keep the buildings as tidy as possible. Coordinated action, not tweets or facebook likes, is exactly what the carnivalesque protests during the summer needed more. While social media has seemed indeed to play a role in bringing people together to protest in the centre of Sofia since June, the students’ organised actions are based on more solid bonds between the participants. As one of the occupiers, Manol Glishev, admits: “Social media can be useful, but there is a lot of spam on them as well. As far as the organisation of the occupation is concerned, friendship networks are decisive.”[13] More so, the occupying students make their decisions as a group, and inside the occupied building itself there is of course no role for social media in the decision-making process, as Glishev explains: “When it comes to decisions of strategy, the occupation’s general assembly votes democratically. The guard duty was organised quickly and the security rules accepted.” The collective experience of occupying and organising also creates ties between activists that are more personal and stronger not only compared to participation in online interactions, but also to passive participation in protest marches.

The importance of friendship networks in relation to the strength of social movements has been demonstrated for example by the student activism of the 1960s. Social media can raise awareness of issues, but higher-risk activism needs more than the possibility of rapid mass dissemination of information. It needs dedication and shared experience, which provides the base for the solidarity through which activists can rely on each other.[14] There is also the problem that when it comes to organised protest action a degree of secrecy is sometimes necessary, which is contrary to the open and exposed character of social media. The occupation at Sofia University started from a small group of students who had previously undertaken protest actions together and came intentionally and well-prepared to the Tokushev lecture in auditorium 272 on 23 October. As student leaderIvaylo Dinev testifies: “To parade along the streets does not require any courage, there is not much passion and madness in them [these marches]. An occupation is something different. It tests the mental and physical powers of each one of us. An occupation is about creating a state within the state. […] To implement an occupation madness is needed, to sustain it – self-organisation.”[15] The element of organisation is not limited to the occupation itself, but the students are at the helm of broader protest initiatives as on 1 November, an official university holiday honouring the national enlighteners, when the students and their professors staged a demonstration under the slogan “Wake Up!”.[16] The fledgling student movement brings with it organisation, coordination, democratic process and leadership. The students’ actions therefore might just be the necessary game changer, as they have added a crucial missing ingredient to the broader protest movement.

The Risks and Problems of Student Action

In addition to a strong, dedicated and expanding organisational network, the occupiers run a lower risk of repression as the government is legally restrained by university autonomy to send in police unless explicitly requested by the Rector. The probability of that happening is deemed pretty low, for as Manol Glishev comments: “We don’t trust the police. The police will not protect us, but they do not have the right to enter the University and the Rector would be politically dead if he asks the police in.” The government has nevertheless resorted to other types of tactics. On Sunday 27 October, a group of young thugs led by the youth wing of the Bulgarian Socialist Party and accompanied by a member of parliament broke into the university premises to intimidate the occupiers. Though they did not manage to enter the occupied building as the student patrols had locked the entrances to the building forcing the thugs to limit their rampage to tearing down the student protesters banners, the incident was televised and the footage went viral on Bulgarian social media. The students then appealed to the protesters to support them against such acts of violence, to which the latter responded in large numbers.[17] Inside the occupied building the students have now barricaded entrances with desks and crates, while their guards patrol the perimeters in order to protect themselves from further physical attacks.[18] While some violent incidents have occurred elsewhere as well, the students face threats mainly from pro-government faculty. Speaking to students occupying the University of National and World Economy, its Rector, Stati Statev, who is a known former communist State Security agent, publically blustered that “the only thing that protects you is that I don’t feel much respect for you.” In a demeaning tone he then continued: “At the moment you are just obstructing, you are merely in the way. All else is an illusion.” Statev’s comments were caught on video.[19] In reaction, during a press conference organised by the occupiers at Sofia University, the students issued a demand for his resignation.[20]

Nevertheless, as the students have turned the university into their battleground, the issue of university autonomy has been cited by professors and students who are critical of the occupation stating that the university should not be a theatre of party-political activity. But as Maya Grekova, Professor in Sociology and a senior faculty member who publically supports the occupation, clarifies “autonomy means autonomy from state intervention in the organisation and management of universities, which, according to the law on university autonomy, leaves space for responsible actions in the name of the common/public interest.”[21] In effect, the university setting provides the fledgling student protest movement with adequate protection. Therefore, another widely propagated accusation by government officials and opponents of the occupation is that the occupiers have thrown the universities into chaos, are disrupting the normal functioning of university life, and are preventing the majority of students of getting an education. While it is true that the students have stopped some classes from taking place in the main building, the reality is far from the opponents’ accusations as Manol Glishev qualifies the occupiers’ actions: “The usual programme is replaced by occupational classes that deal with topics such as civil rights issues and political problems.” The impact of the cancelled classes has not led to chaos, as Professor Grekova explains: “I wouldn’t say that there is any chaos at the University as only the main building is occupied and the students there have established an immaculate order. They show an extraordinary maturity both in their declarations as well as in their published texts on the Internet.” Assistant Professor Gergana Dineva adds that “the administration didn’t stop functioning, the lecturers didn’t stop going to work. Only a few disciplines are partially experiencing some difficulties to implement their normal schedule. The university library, which is part of the occupied building, is functioning normally and every student who can show his or her student card can freely enter and leave the building. Planned conferences as well as the state final certification examinations are all taking place.”

The Politics of Occupation

The only way in which the university’s day-to-day life has changed, is that “lecturers and students are now debating the current social and political situation livelier than ever,” as Dineva states. At Sofia University, the professoriate is placed in somewhat of an ambiguous position, but the situation at other universities is definitely worse, as Professor Grekova again explains: “Our situation, that of the professors who support the protest but continue to have classes with students who do not support their colleagues’ protest, is complicated. But the situation is much harder at other universities where, even though students are occupying only one auditorium, the reaction from the administration has been extremely negative.” The government has also attempted to manipulate and provoke the occupiers directly. The Minister of Education invited them to discuss their demands. The occupiers immediately dismissed this move as they want the government to resign and therefore will not negotiate with its members. The Minister then staged a meeting with pro-government youth organisations who denounced the occupation movement. In protest, professors issued a declaration referring to the European Union’s Charter of Students in which they strongly condemn the government’s tactics of ‘lies and mafiatisation’: “The use of such totalitarian practices of control and pressure against those who think differently violates the autonomy of higher education institutions. […] Calling in those who are discontent to such meetings is an attempt at direct party control over all the students and professors who support them and once again delegitimises the current government.”[22]

Apart from the government, and both left and right-wing commentators slandering the students’ actions, other less-politically invested observers have been critical or patronising towards them in the media. Some of them see the occupation as too political while others in contrast accused the students of not stating clear-enough political demands. Much of the confusion arises from the fact that the students have explicitly declared their non-endorsement of any political party thereby presenting the occupation as a form of anti-politics. Anti-politics here means that the Ranobudnite Studenti and their actions are focused upon civic activity within society rather than policy outcomes within the state.[23] However, anti-politics in the current Bulgarian case does not imply an apolitical stance or apolitical demands – as the current government would wish the students to put forward– but a non-party-political position, it is therefore not incompatible with the political demand for the government’s resignation. As Bulgarian sociologist Boyan Znepolski underscored in the weekly Kultura: “Today’s student protest represents a significant social protest in the sense of rehabilitating society against the arbitrary rule of the political class. The demand for the separation of politics from behind-the-curtains clientilism is beyond the left-right divide. For today’s politicians there exists only private interests which they present in the media that serve them as the public interest vis-à-vis the citizens. For them the public interest is merely a media fiction. Therefore, for all citizens for whom the public interest in not merely a media fiction, no matter if they are ‘left’ or ‘right’, the cause taken up by Bulgaria’s students is their common cause and they should support it.”[24]

Although the issue of how specific or how political the students’ demands are seems to be a popular topic for commentators to linger on, it is not the most important element of the occupation. Since the beginning of the occupation, the students have practised a far-going form of participatory democracy, making decisions by voting in a general assembly. University auditoria like 272 are quite adequate to host such gatherings. This inclusive democratic involvement of the participants of the occupation contrasts on every level with their perception of the way the country is run. There is also a strong symbolical notion in that the occupied Rectorate of Sofia University is but a few hundred meters away from the Parliament on the same central avenue. In addition, it is important to underline that the students see their actions through their specific position as students. They have deliberately given their actions a student identity and as such wish to reach out to society. While they have set up working groups to discuss the country’s problems and think up their own solutions, they have explicitly stated their willingness to be part of the debate on the country’s future but only after the government’s resignation.[25] This does not mean that they do not have a position to take as some observers claim. On 9 November the occupiers at Sofia University read an open letter outlining their position on higher education during a press conference they organised: “We demand more autonomy for students, as well as their inclusion in the decision making process. Bulgaria’s youth should be given the chance to take responsibility and make choices that affect the community – in short, to be an active participant in the social contract.”[26] Both the practices of their anti-politics as well as their participatory democracy are vital experiences that provide an important school of open democracy, an example they can spread further in the broader movement.

The Historical Role of Students

Another reason why the student protest movement matters is that there exists a strong historical precedent that testifies in favour of their actions. From a broader historical point of view, student movements have often been at the core of important developments that resulted in political change, in particular if they were aligned with a broader social movement. In most European countries these movements rather belong to the memory of a more distant era like 1968, but not so in Bulgaria. In 1997, during a wave of large-scale anti-government protests students were also at the fore and members of that student generation have voiced their support for the current occupiers seeing common cause with their own struggle 16 years ago.[27] One of the 1997 veterans, Dimitar Bechev, a senior policy fellow and head of the Sofia office of the European Council on Foreign Relations, describes the solidarity with today’s occupiers as follows: “Our presence at the University is symbolic, we didn’t come to lecture the students for they are mature enough. We felt it was important to come and show our support. They might come under attack in the media just as in 1997 when we experienced a smear campaign. In such circumstances it is important to show support.”[28] Bechev also stresses the fact that times have changed and points out that members of older generations should not patronise the current generation of students: “They, the students of today, have a different style. In 1997, we had a long debate whether to stage an occupation in addition to the anti-government rallies we initiated. The current generation immediately went for occupation. It is not for us to tell them what to do, we can share our advice, but they are in the driving seat.”

Apart from the student movement of 1997, there have been other instances in recent history during which students in Bulgaria have become politicised such as in 1990.[29] But today’s occupiers invoke another historical symbol of student protest, the near-mythical 1968 student revolt in France. While there are of course differences between the 1960s in Cold War Western Europe and today’s situation in Bulgaria, one can also see how the example inspires. In 1968, students rebelled, radically speaking out against the powers that be. They also practised forms of participatory democracy and they managed to change their societal reality. One of the resonating slogans of the spirit of 1968 was “be a realist, ask the impossible.” Bulgarian students today are echoing that slogan in their demand for the government to resign. They oppose the whole present political establishment, not only the government parties, but also the sole opposition party, GERB, which led the previous government. Nearly a quarter of a century since the end of the communist regime, Bulgaria’s political situation is still far from resembling a true open and transparent democracy, where government is elected by the people and governs for the people. In this sense, many might feel that the students are demanding the impossible, but the young Ranobudnite Studenti are realists nonetheless. They have chosen to make a stand and fight. They are realists, as they know that in order for change to occur they have to demand what today seems impossible, and they have shown that they have the courage to do so. Equally significant is that they, as students, are imbued with a calling, a missionary sense towards society. This is a shared characteristic of student movements that have played important roles in history.[30] Today’s student occupiers seem indeed to be inspired by a sense of mission that as members of the younger generation they can bring about change. A slogan on one of their banners attached to the university’s facade puts it bluntly: “1968-1997-2013… It’s our turn now!”

No Conclusion, but a Show of Strength

March of Justice on 10 November

At the time of writing, after more than two weeks of students occupying universities, the fledgling student movement decided to test its strength. While recent polls showed that about 60% of Bulgarians supported their protest, similar polls in Bulgaria in the past have been cited when it came to electoral support, and they had a tendency to show continuous levels of support for the political parties in power. However, real support in (fair and transparent) elections is ultimately measured by votes in the ballot box, not polls. With a social movement, its strength is measured by the number of people it can mobilise. Just as the occupation movement was going into its third week, the Ranobudnite Studenti moved to take that step. They launched a call for a national ‘March of Justice’ on 10 November. The date was not chosen haphazard as it was the 24th anniversary of the ousting of Todor Zhivkov, the former long-time communist leader whose demise signalled the end of the communist regime. The symbolism of the date for today’s students’ struggle is especially important as they see the transition as incomplete while many of them had not even been born at the time of Zhivkov’s downfall in 1989. In their public appeal to assemble in front of Sofia University’s main building before heading to the Parliament and the Council of Ministers, the students called among others for a “responsible public policy in education, admission to government positions only for proven professionals and an end to state-run media being used for party propaganda.”[31]

What then took place could not but have made an impression on the young occupiers. More than 15,000 answered their call and a massive procession of students supported by Bulgarians of all generations marched through the capital’s main avenues.[32] More so, the demonstration was carefully coordinated by the students themselves. They were at the helm, they were the ones that addressed the crowds, their flashmob routines resulted in the rehearsed enactment of a mock resignation of the Prime Minister, and they had their security guards from the occupation ensure the seamless progress of thousands of protesters. Within just over two weeks the students have channelled with their actions  the resentment and provided the existing broader protest movement with organisation, visible leadership and, most importantly, reinvigorated the movement as a whole.

Historians can usually rely on the benefit of hindsight, so it remains to be seen if the emerging Bulgarian student protest movement will make or change history. However, as Ivaylo Dinev, one of the leaders of the occupation and spokesmen of the Ranobudnite Studenti declared when he greeted and addressed thousands of protesters in front of the occupied main building of Sofia University: “We do not address our messages only to politicians. We address them to every person. […] We, the children of Transition, have taken the relay baton. Yes, maybe we were hasty. But we are aware that change needs time and time needs actions. We do not have vain illusions. We believe only in ourselves and the people. We have courage and patience. We have a moral cause and a reason to be here. A reason to get united. A reason to fight. A reason to protest, to go on strike, to occupy. The reason is that we insist on the present in order to have a future in Bulgaria.”[33]


Tom Junes is a visiting fellow at the Aleksanteri Institute in Helsinki and a scholarly collaborator of the Human and Social Studies Foundation in Sofia. In 2011-2012 he was a Geremek fellow at IWM.

© Author / Transit 2013

[1]. The quotes from interviews in this article are taken from those conducted by the author in English from 6 to 8 November 2013. The author thanks Maya Grekova, Gergana Dineva, Dimitar Bechev, and Manol Glishev, for their willingness to share their views. The author also wishes to thank Elitza Stanoeva for her assistance, and in particular for her translation of Bulgarian sources.

[2]. Ivan Krastev, “Why Bulgaria’s Protests Stand Out in Europe,”, [last accessed 10/11/2013].

[3]. “Hristo Biserov Has Left Bulgaria,” FOCUS News Agency, [last accessed 10/11/2013].

[4]. “Kiossev: ‘There’s a Moral Solidarity in Bulgaria’,”, [last accessed 10/11/2013].

[5]. “Birth of a Civil Society,” The Economist, [last accessed 10/11/2013]; Boyko Vassilev, “They Want It Now”, Transitions Online, [last accessed 10/11/2013].

[6]. G. K., “Students on the Barricades,” The Economist, [last accessed 10/11/2013].

[7]. Thomas Seymat, “Bulgarian Students Join Anti-government Protests, Occupy University Buildings,” Euronews, [last accessed 10/11/2013].

[8]. Interview with Gergana Dineva.

[9]. “???????????? ?????: ?? ??????? ????? ????? ?? ???????. ??????????: ?????????? ??????????,” ???????, [last accessed 10/11/2013].

[10]. Thomas Seymat, “‘Wake up!’ Bulgarian students take to the streets to ‘change [their] future’,” Euronews, [last accessed 10/11/2013].

[11]. “Bulgarian student protests continue amid allegations of phone-tapping, threats,” The Sofia Globe, [last accessed 10/11/2013].

[12]. ????? ???????, “?????? ????? ‘??????????, ?? ??? ?? ????? ??? ???????. ??? ?? ??? ??????, ??? ?? ??? ?? ??????.’,” Sofia Live, [last accessed 10/11/2013].

[13]. Interview with Manol Glishev.

[14]. Malcolm Gladwell, “Why The Revolution Will Not Be Tweeted,” The New Yorker, [last accessed 10/11/2013].

[15]. ????? ???????? and ????????? ??????, “??????????? Vs. ?????????: ?????????? ?????? ????? ? ???????? ?????? ????? ?? ????? ?????? ?? ??????????,” Standart News, [last accessed 10/11/2013].

[16]. Thomas Seymat, “‘Wake up!’ Bulgarian students take to the streets to ‘change [their] future’,” Euronews, [last accessed 10/11/2013].

[17]. “Protesting students will join anti-govt protest in Bulgaria”, FOCUS News Agency, [last accessed 10/11/2013].

[18]. Charlotte Mcdonald-Gibson, “Students invoke spirit of ’68 in fight to rid Bulgaria of corruption,” The Independent, [last accessed 10/11/2013].

[19]. “???????? ?? ???? ??? ??????????? ???? ????????: ???? ?? ? ??? ??? ? ??? ???? ?? ?? ????,” ???????, [last accessed 10/11/2013].

[20]. “??????????? ???????? ???????? ????????? ?? ??????? ?? ????,”, [last accessed 10/11/2013].

[21]. Interview with Maya Grekova.

[22]. ?????????? ????????, ” ???????????????: ? ??????????? ???????? ?????????????? ???????? ?????????? ??,” OFFNews,bg, [last accessed 10/11/2013].

[23]. David Ost, Solidarity and the Politics of Anti-Politics: Opposition and Reform in Poland since 1968 (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1990), 2.

[24]. ???? ?????????, ” ??????????? ?? ???? ?????,” ???????, [last accessed 10/11/2013].

[25]. “??????????? ???????? ???????? ????????? ?? ??????? ?? ????,”, [last accessed 10/11/2013].

[26]. “Bulgarian Student Protesters Demand Educational Reforms,”,  [last accessed 10/11/2013].

[27]. Dimitar Bechev, “Pourquoi nous devons protester avec les étudiants,” Courrier International, [last accessed 10/11/2013].

[28]. Interview with Dimitar Bechev.

[29]. Boyko Vassilev, “Occupy Alma Mater”, Transitions Online, [last accessed 10/11/2013].

[30]. Tom Junes, “Oppositional Student Politics in Poland and South Africa: Youth Rebellion as a Factor in the Demise of Communism and Apartheid,” Studia Historyczne LV, no. 3-4 (219-220) (2012): 391-92.

[31]. “Bulgarian anti-government student protesters plan nationwide ‘March of Justice’ protest for November 10,” The Sofia Globe,…otesters-plan-nationwide-march-of-justice-protest-for-november-10 [last accessed 10/11/2013].

[32].  “??? 15 000 ??????? ????????? ?? ?????????, ??????????? ???? ?????????,”, [last accessed 10/11/2013].

[33]. “?????? ?????: ?????????? ?? ??????????, ?? ?? ????? ?????? ? ????????,” ???????, [last accessed 10/11/2013].



Related Content

  • The Trap of Being New Europe

    In the face of the migration crisis and populist shift within the EU, the outmoded and stale division between New and Old Europe is coming back into favor in European public debate. The concept of ‘New Europe’ can easily serve to explain and at the same time to normalize, in a politically correct way, a qualitative difference between Western Europe and its Eastern neighbors. From a Central and Eastern European perspective, however, the term ‘New Europe’ seems essentially contradictory, since being a part of Europe in its cultural and political dimensions always was and still is an undebatable assumption.
    Read more

  • Shedding Light on Corruption: A Small Romanian Victory

    “We see you”. This short message, projected on a building near the Romanian government's headquarters, was the main message from hundreds of thousands of people to their politicians. At 9 PM local time, on Sunday, 5 February 2017, some 250,000 people turned on their mobile phones' flashlights, in a symbolic gesture of “shedding light on corruption”. A total of 600,000 people gathered in Romania that night, making it the largest protest movement in the country since 1989.
    Read more

  • Invalid Anti-Migrant Referendum in Hungary

    Despite all the immoral and unlawful efforts of the government to influence the Hungarian voters, the majority of them did not cast votes, and made the referendum invalid. Disregarding this result, at the night of the referendum, Prime Minister Orbán announced the amendment of the constitution “in order to give a form to the will of the people.”
    Read more

  • Knowns and Unknowns behind Turkey’s Failed Coup

    Although Turkey has meager democratic credentials, a military intervention is not a solution for re-establishing or consolidating democracy in Turkey. Surprisingly, the deeply divided Turkish political scene was unified in condemning the coup attempt and Gulen’s movement.
    Read more

  • Austria: The Lesson of the Far Right

    The presidential election situation that arose in Austria in May and will be repeated in October—a run-off between the Greens and the far right—has never occurred in Europe before. But it starkly reveals a fundamental political conflict that can be found in many Western democracies today. This conflict is not meaningfully described as one of “ordinary people versus the establishment.” In Austria, both the Freedom Party and the Green Party have been “established” since the mid-1980s; in Britain, Boris Johnson, one of the main faces of the Brexit campaign, is about as establishment as one can get in the UK; and Donald Trump is hardly the authentic representative of Main Street. Rather, on one side of the new conflict are those who advocate more openness: toward minorities at home and toward engagement with the world on the outside.
    Read more

  • The Warsaw NATO Summit and beyond

    Obama’s criticism and the embarrassing act of censorship of his speech notwithstanding, the NATO Warsaw Summit proved on balance to be successful for Poland’s foreign policy goals, as well as those of NATO’s other Eastern Allies, as they have managed to secure NATO’s increased presence on the Eastern flanks as part of a defence against, and a deterrent to, Putin’s Russia. Nevertheless, with the UK gradually losing its influence following the Brexit referendum and most likely leaving the EU within a few years, Poland and NATO’s Eastern Allies are losing an important ally that provided significant political support for these countries in the EU and NATO. Law and Justice may also face growing isolation on the European level, especially if it does not find an acceptable solution for the constitutional crisis and continues questionable practices in the media sphere.
    Read more

  • Eastern Europe Is Both Dreading Brexit and Ready for It

    What seemed impossible even a year ago now seems fated. The European Union will probably be better run with Britain out, but it is unlikely to survive if the British next week decide to leave. “The Radetzky March” is particularly apt here because, though the focus after a Leave victory will be on Britain, the real disaster will befall Roth’s literary stamping grounds of Central and Eastern Europe. Indeed, in a very real way, the disintegration of Europe will be set off by Brexit, but it will take place far to the east.
    Read more

  • Behind the New German Right

    Throughout its postwar history, Germany somehow managed to resist the temptations of right-wing populism. Not any longer. It is now possible to be an outspoken nationalist without being associated with—or, for that matter, without having to say anything about—the Nazi past.
    Read more

  • America Hasn’t Gone Crazy. It’s Just More Like Europe

    In comparing themselves with Europe, Americans prided themselves on the fact that “It can’t happen here” — namely, European socialism and European fascism. It viewed itself as immune to the pathologies of democracy: Crowds can go crazy in any other place in the world, but not in America, the land of common sense. But after the last years of extreme polarization and dysfunctional governance, are Americans still convinced that their democracy cannot be upended?
    Read more

  • Committee for the Defense of Democracy in Poland: Rebellion of the “Beneficiaries of the Transformation”?

    KOD is avoiding sensitive subjects, which could divide its sympathizers, but at the same time with its moderate postulates it discourages those Poles who blame the former centrist government for its cultural conservatism and economic neoliberalism. By integrating different party groups, KOD is building its political capital, but at the same time it pays a high price for it. It is easy for PiS to frame these social protests as a revolt by those who lost the election and cannot accept their defeat.
    Read more

Tr@nsit Online Authors

  • Bradley F. Abrams

    History, Stanford University
    Read more

  • Thomas Ahbe

    Thomas Ahbe studierte Philosophie, Ökonomie und Soziologie. Seit 1998 wirkt er freischaffend als Sozialwissenschaftler und Publizist. Seine Arbeitsschwerpunkte sind Diskurs- und Kulturgeschichte der deutschen Zweistaatlichkeit und der ostdeutschen Transformation sowie die Generationengeschichte der DDR und Ostdeutschlands.   Print

  • Karl Aiginger

    Karl Aiginger is Director of WIFO (Österreichisches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung), Professor of Economics and Coordinator of the project A new growth path for Europe within the 7th European Framework Program.   Print

  • Huercan Asli Aksoy

    Ph.D. candidate in Political Science, University of Tübingen
    Read more

  • Sorin Antohi

    Sorin Antohi is Professor of History at Central European University, Budapest.   Print

  • Timothy Garton Ash

    History, Oxford
    Read more

  • Roumen Avramov

    Program director for economic research at the Center for Liberal Strategies, Sofia
    Read more

  • Adam Baczko

    PhD Candidate in Political Science, EHESS, Paris
    Read more

  • Rainer Bauböck

    Rainer Bauböck is professor of social and political theory at the European University Institute in Florence. In 2006 he was awarded the Latsis Prize of the European Science Foundation for his work on immigration and social cohesion in modern societies. Among his many publications are Immigration and Boundaries of Citizenship (1992), Transnational Citizenship: Membership and …
    Read more

  • Steven Beller

    Geschichte, Cambridge
    Read more

  • Naja Bentzen

    Freelance journalist, Wien
    Read more

  • Luiza Bialasiewicz

    Professor of European Governance, University of Amsterdam
    Read more

  • Muriel Blaive

    Advisor to the Director, in Charge of Research and Methodology, Institute for the Study of Totalitarian Regimes, Prague
    Read more

  • András Bozóki

    Professor of Political Science, Central European University, Budapest
    Read more

  • José Casanova

    Professor für Soziologie, New School for Social Research, New York
    Read more

  • Daniel Chirot

    Soziologie, Seattle
    Read more

  • Robert Cooper

    Robert Cooper ist britischer Diplomat und derzeit als Sonderberater des Europäischen Auswärtigen Dienstes (European External Action Service, EEAS) tätig. Er ist zudem Gründungsmitglied des European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR).   Print

  • Peter Demetz

    Sterling Professor Emeritus of German and Comparative Literature, Yale University; Korrespondierendes Mitglied des IWM
    Read more

  • James Dodd

    Associate Professor of Philosophy, Special Advisor to the Dean on Faculty Affairs, New School for Social Research
    Read more

  • Martin Endreß

    Martin Endreß ist Professor für Soziologie an der Universität Trier.   Print

  • Mischa Gabowitsch

    Mischa Gabowitsch ( is a research fellow at the Einstein Forum in Potsdam. He is the author of Putin kaputt!? (Suhrkamp, 2013), a study of the 2011-13 Russian protests for fair elections, and maintains, which collects academic resources for the study of protest in Russia.   Print

  • Charles Gati

    Charles Gati is Senior Acting Director of Russian and Eurasian Studies and Foreign Policy Institute Senior Fellow at the School of Advanced International Studies at the Johns Hopkins University, Washington, D.C.     Print

  • Dessy Gavrilova

    Dessy Gavrilova is the founding Director of The Red House – Center for Culture and Debate in Sofia, Bulgaria.     Print

  • Keith Gessen

    Keith Gessen is a freelance writer living in Cambridge, MA.   Print

  • Gerhard Gnauck

    Warsaw correspondent for Die Welt
    Read more

  • Katya Gorchinskaya

    Managing Editor for Investigative Programming, Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (REF/RL), Kyiv
    Read more

  • John Gray

    John Gray is Professor of European Thought at the London School of Economics.   Print

  • Rainer Gries

    Rainer Gries lehrt und forscht als Universitätsprofessor am Historischen Institut der Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, am Institut für Publizistik- und Kommunikationswissenschaft der Universität Wien sowie an der Sigmund Freud PrivatUniversität Wien. Zu seinen Forschungsschwerpuntken zählen u.a. die Gesellschaftsgeschichte Deutschlands und Österreichs im 20. Jahrhundert und die Geschichte des Konsums in Europa.   Print

  • Eva Hahn

    Read more

  • Gábor Halmai

    Professor of Law, Department of European Studies; Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest
    Read more

  • Elemer Hankiss

    Professor für Politikwissenschaft, Eötvös Lorand Universität, Budapest; Korrespondierendes Mitglied des IWM
    Read more

  • Miklós Haraszti

    Miklós Haraszti is a writer, journalist, human rights advocate and university professor. He served the maximum of two terms as the OSCE Representative on Freedom of the Media from 2004 to 2010. Currently he is Adjunct Professor at the School of International and Public Affairs of Columbia Law School, New York. Haraszti studied philosophy and …
    Read more

  • Sabine Hark

    Sabine Hark forscht an der Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Universität Potsdam, Professur für Frauenforschung.   Print

  • Annemieke Hendriks

    Freelance journalist, Berlin
    Read more

  • Charles Hirschman

    Charles Hirschman is Boeing International Professor at the Department of Sociology and the Daniel J. Evans School of Public Affairs, Washington University.     Print

  • Jennifer L. Hochschild

    Jennifer L. Hochschild is Professor of Government at the John F. Kennedy School of Government, and Professor of African and African-American Studies at the Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Harvard University.   Print

  • Yaroslav Hrytsak

    History, Central European University Budapest
    Read more

  • Richard Hyman

    Richard Hyman ist Professor für Politikwissenschaft an der London School of Economics.   Print

  • Vladislav Inozemtsev

    Professor of Economics at Higher School of Economics; Director, Centre for Post-Industrial Studies, Moscow
    Read more

  • Bruce P. Jackson

    Bruce P. Jackson is the founder and President of the Project on Transitional Democracies. The Project is a multi-year endeavour aimed at accelerating the pace of reform in post-1989 democracies and advancing the date for the integration of these democracies into the institutions of the Euro-Atlantic. Jackson has written extensively about the engagement of Russia …
    Read more

  • Tom Junes

    Visiting Researcher, Warsaw University, and Visiting Lecturer in Polish history, KULeuven, Belgium
    Read more

  • Alex J. Kay

    Alex J. Kay holds a PhD in History from the Humboldt University Berlin.   Print

  • Anatoly M. Khazanov

    Anatoly M. Khazanov ist Professor für Anthropologie an der University of Wisconsin, Madison.   Print

  • Cornelia Klinger

    Professor of Philosophy, University of Tübingen
    Read more

  • Gudrun-Axeli Knapp

    Professor of Social Sciences and Social Psychology, University of Hannover
    Read more

  • Jacek Kochanowicz

    Jacek Kochanowicz is Professor for Economic History at Warsaw University.       Print

  • Michal Kopecek

    International Relations, Charles University Prague
    Read more

  • János Kornai

    János Kornai is Prof. em. for Economics  at Harvard University and Permanent Fellow at the Collegium Budapest – Institute for Advanced Study. He is a member of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences and the Academia Europeae, and Foreign Member of the American, British, Bulgarian, Finnish, Russian and Swedish Academies. He has served as President of …
    Read more

  • Bilyana Kourtasheva

    Post-Doc in Theory and History of Literature, New Bulgarian University, Sofia
    Read more

  • János Mátyás Kovács

    IWM Permanent Fellow
    Senior member of RECET, Institute of East European History, Vienna University; Professor of Economic History, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest
    Read more

  • Ivan Krastev

    IWM Permanent Fellow
    Chair of the Board, Centre for Liberal Strategies, Sofia
    Read more

  • Yustyna Kravchuk

    PhD candidate in Film and Media Studies, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv
    Read more

  • Jacek Kucharczyk

    Jacek Kucharczyk ist Head of Programs am Institute of Public Affairs in Warschau.   Print

  • Aleksander Kwasniewski

    Aleksander Kwasniewski war Präsident Polens. Seine Amtszeit verlief von 1995 bis 2005 über zwei Legislaturperioden.   Print

  • Mladen Lazic

    Professor of Sociology, University of Belgrade
    Read more

  • Claus Leggewie

    Professor für Politikwissenschaft, Justus-Liebig-Universität Giessen
    Read more

  • Mark Leonard

    Co-founder and Director, European Council on Foreign Relations
    Read more

  • André Liebich

    Honorary Professor of International History and Politics, Graduate Institute, Geneva
    Read more

  • Burkhard Liebsch

    Burkhard Liebsch ist Professor für Philosophie an der Ruhr-Universität Bochum.   Print

  • Michal Luczewski

    Ph.D. candidate in Sociology, Warsaw University
    Read more

  • Charles S. Maier

    Charles S. Maier ist Direktor des Center for European Studies, Harvard University.   Print

  • Andrey Makarychev

    Andrey Makarychev ist Professor und Research Fellow am Institut Osteuropäische Studien an der Freien Universität Berlin.   Print

  • Michał Maciej Matlak

    Ph.D. candidate, Department of Political and Social Sciences, European University Institute, Florence
    Read more

  • Erik Meyer

    Erik Meyer ist seit 2000 wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter am Sonderforschungsbereich ‘Erinnerungskulturen’ an der Justus-Liebig Universität Gießen.   Print

  • Krzysztof Michalski

    IWM Founding Rector
    Read more

  • Hans J. Misselwitz

    Hans-Jürgen Misselwitz ist ein deutscher SPD-Politiker und Gründungsmitglied des Instituts Solidarische Moderne.   Print

  • Alessandro Monsutti

    Alessandro Monsutti is an associate professor of anthropology and development sociology at the Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies in Geneva, as well as research associate at the Refugee Studies Centre at the University of Oxford. He worked as a consultant for several nongovernmental and international organizations, icnluding UNHCR. His book War and Migration: Social Networks …
    Read more

  • Jan-Werner Müller

    Professor of Politics, Princeton University

    Visiting Fellow
    (September 2016 – August 2017)
    Read more

  • Rainer Münz

    Professor für Bevölkerungswissenschaft, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin; Korrespondierendes Mitglied des IWM
    Read more

  • Sighard Neckel

    Professor of Sociology, Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt am Main
    Read more

  • Katherine Newman

    Katherine S. Newman is the James B. Knapp Dean of The Zanvyl Krieger School of Arts and Sciences. She is a widely published expert on poverty and the working poor who led major interdisciplinary initiatives at Princeton and Harvard universities.     Print

  • Pierre Nora

    Pierre Nora lehrt Geschichte an der École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales (EHESS) in Paris.   Print

  • Tereza Novotna

    Political Science, Boston University
    Read more

  • Ewald Nowotny

    Ewald Nowotny is Governor of the Austrian National Bank.   Print

  • Thomas Nowotny

    Thomas Nowotny teaches Political Science at the University of Vienna. He has been Austrian diplomat, private secretary to Austrian Chancellor Bruno Kreisky, senior political counselor to the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, and consultant to the OECD.   Print

  • Vlad Odobescu

    Freelance journalist, Romanian Centre for Investigative Journalism, Bucharest
    Read more

  • Andrzej Paczkowski

    Professor für Geschichte, Institut für Politische Studien, Polnische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Warschau
    Read more

  • Emilia Palonen

    Politics, University of Essex
    Read more

  • Irina Papkova

    Irina Papkova is a Research Fellow of Georgetown University’s Berkley Center for Religion, Peace, and World Affairs. She spent five years teaching at the Department of International Relations and European Studies at Central European University, Budapest.   Print

  • Agnieszka Pasieka

    Ph.D. in Social Anthropology from the Martin Luther University, Halle/Saale
    Read more

  • Gleb Pavlovsky

    President, Center of Effective Policies; Member, Public Chamber of the Russian Federation; Editor-in-Chief, The Russian Journal, Moscow
    Read more

  • György Péteri

    Professor of Contemporary European History, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim
    Read more

  • Tanja Petrovic

    Tanja Petrovic works at the Scientific Research Center of the Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Ljubljana.   Print

  • David Petruccelli

    PhD candidate in History, Yale University
    Read more

  • Alexander von Plato

    Alexander von Plato ist ein deutscher Philosoph und Historiker. Er gründete das Instituts für Geschichte und Biographie an der Fernuniversität Hagen, das er bis 2007 leitete. Von 1996 bis 2000 war er Sekretär der International Oral History Association, von 2006 bis 2008 deren Vizepräsident. Er ist Mitherausgeber und Redakteur von BIOS – Zeitschrift für Biographieforschung, Oral …
    Read more

  • Andrei Pleșu

    Andrei Pleșu ist Rektor des New Europe College, Bukarest. 1989- 1991 war er rumänischer Kulturminister und 1997- 1999 rumänischer Außenminister.   Print

  • Martin Pollack

    Martin Pollack, geb. 1944 in OÖ, studierte Slawistik und osteuropäische Geschichte. Er war von 1987 bis 1998 Redakteur des “Spiegel” in Warschau und Wien und lebt heute als Schriftsteller und literarischer Übersetzer in Wien und Bocksdorf im Südburgenland. 2011 erhielt er den Leipziger Buchpreis zur Europäischen Verständigung und 2012 den Stanislaw-Vincenz-Preis. Zuletzt erschien von ihm …
    Read more

  • Krzysztof Pomian

    Krzysztof Pomian is Professor of History at the Nicolaus Copernicus University (Toruń) and Academic Director of the Museum of Europe in Brussels.   Print

  • Romano Prodi

    Romano Prodi war von September 1999 bis November 2004 Präsident der Europäischen Kommission.   Print

  • Lipin Ram

    PhD candidate and teaching assistant in Anthropology and Sociology of Development, Graduate Institute, Geneva
    Read more

  • Mykola Riabchuk

    Senior Research Fellow, Institute of Political and Nationalities’ Studies, Academy of Sciences, Kyiv
    Read more

  • Edelbert Richter

    Edelbert Richter ist deutscher Theologe, Politiker und war Mitglied des Deutschen Bundestages.   Print

  • Paul Ricoeur

    Paul Ricoeur ist Philosoph und war Professor Emeritus an der University of Chicago und an der Sorbonne. Er war Mitglied der Académie Francaise und Mitglied des Wissenschaftlichen Beirats des IWM. Er starb 2005.   Print

  • Michel Rocard

    Michel Rocard, former First Secretary of the French Socialist Party and a member of the European Parliament for 15 years, was Prime Minister of France from 1988 to 1991.   Print

  • Akos Rona-Tas

    Akos Rona-Tas is professor at the Sociology Department of the University of California, San Diego and a research associate at Met@risk, INRA, Paris. He is the author of the books Plastic Money: Constructing Markets for Credit Cards in Eight Postcommunist Countries (with Alya Guseva, 2014) and Surprise of the Small Transformation: Demise of Communism and …
    Read more

  • Lew Rubinstein

    Lew Rubinstein lebt als Poet und Essayist in Moskau. Nach dem Studium der Philologie war er als Bibliothekar tätig. Seit Ende der 1960er-Jahre verfasst er poetische Arbeiten, seit 1974 serielle Textzyklen als so genannte Kartotheken. Zusammen mit Andrej Monastyrskij, Dimitrij A. Prigov und Vladimir Sorokin gilt er als wichtigster Vertreter des Moskauer Konzeptualismus. Print

  • Jacques Rupnik

    Geschichte und Politikwissenschaft, Paris
    Read more

  • Claudia Šabic

    Claudia Šabi? ist Politikwissenschaftlerin und Ethnologin. Seit 1998 ist sie Wissenschaftliche Mitarbeiterin an der Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt am Main. Print

  • Ranabir Samaddar

    Distinguished Chair in Migration and Forced Migration Studies, Calcutta Research Group
    Read more

  • Paul Sanders

    Paul Sanders is a historian and management scholar. He is a full-time professor at Reims Management School in Reims, France. He has published across the disciplines of history, international relations and leadership.   Print

  • Karl Schlögel

    Karl Schlögel war Professor für Osteuropäische Geschichte zuerst an der Universität Konstanz, dann an der Europa-Universität Viadrina in Frankfurt/Oder. Nach seiner Emeritierung arbeitet er an einer Archäologie des Kommunismus und einer Geschichte des Wolgaraumes. Zurzeit ist er City of Vienna/IFK Fellow am IFK in Wien.     Print

  • Thomas Schmid

    Thomas Schmid is the publisher of the WELT Group, Berlin. He worked for various newspapers, among them as editor of the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung and the Frankfurter Allgemeine Sonntagszeitung. From 2006 to 2010 he was Editor-in-Chief of Die Welt.   Print

  • Margit Schratzenstaller

    Margit Schratzenstaller is senior researcher at the Austrian Institute of Economic Research (WIFO) and is currently coordinating (together with Karl Aiginger and Stefan Ederer) ‘WWW for Europe’, a 4-year research project within the 7th Framework Program funded by the European Commission.   Print

  • Dieter Segert

    Dieter Segert ist Professor für Transformationsprozesse in Mittel-, Südost- und Osteuropa am Institut für Politikwissenschaft der Universität Wien. Seit September 2007 ist er Mitglied des Vorstandes des IDM Wien, seit Juni 2008 Mitglied der Leibniz-Sozietät der Wissenschaften zu Berlin.   Print

  • Victoriya Sereda

    Sociologie, Ivan-Franko-Universität, Lviv
    Read more

  • Michel Serres

    Michel Serres ist Philosoph und Mitglied der Académie Française.   Print

  • Anton Shekhovtsov

    PhD in Political Science
    Read more

  • Marci Shore

    Associate Professor of History, Yale University

    Visiting Fellow
    (July 2020 – June 2021)
    Read more

  • Sławomir Sierakowski

    Director, Institute for Advanced Study, Warsaw; Founder, "Krytyka Polityczna" movement
    Read more

  • Sara Silverstein

    Ph.D. Candidate in Modern European and International History, Yale University
    Read more

  • Ondřej Slačálek

    Assistant Professor of Political Science, Charles University, Prague
    Read more

  • Aleksander Smolar

    Political Science, Paris
    Read more

  • Timothy Snyder

    IWM Permanent Fellow
    Richard C. Levin Professor of History, Yale University
    Read more

  • George Soros

    George Soros is a pioneer of the hedge-fund industry, investor and philanthropist, he is the author of many books, including Financial Turmoil in Europe and the United States: Essays (2012), The Soros Lectures: At the Central European University (2010), The Crash of 2008 and What it Means: The New Paradigm for Finance Markets (2009).   …
    Read more

  • Robert Spaemann

    Robert Spaemann ist Professor em. für Philosophie an der Universität München.   Print

  • Pawel Spiewak

    Associate Professor of Sociology, Department of Sociology and Philosophy, Warsaw University
    Read more

  • Wilfried Stadler

    Wilfried Stadler ist Unternehmensberater, Wirtschaftspublizist und Honorarprofessor an der Wirtschaftsuniversität Wien. Bis 2009 war er Vorstandsvorsitzender einer österreichischen Spezialbank für Unternehmensfinanzierung.   Print

  • Rudolf Stamm

    Rudolf Stamm war von 1975 bis 1988 Korrespondent der Neuen Zürcher Zeitung für Osteuropa und Österreich, anschließend bis 1999 für Italien, dann bis zu seiner Pensionierung 2002 für die USA mit Sitz in Washington D.C. Er starb 2010 in der Schweiz. 1985 erscheinen seine NZZ-Reportagen aus Osteuropa in dem Band Alltag und Tradition in Osteuropa. …
    Read more

  • Paul Starr

    Paul Starr ist Professor für Soziologie an der Princeton University und Mitherausgeber von The American Prospect. Er ist Pulitzer-Preisträger.   Print

  • Martina Steer

    ÖAW APART Fellow (History)
    Read more

  • Kristina Stoeckl

    Research Director
    APART Fellow, Austrian Academy of Sciences; Department of Political Sciences, University of Vienna
    Read more

  • Roman Szporluk

    Roman Szporluk is Professor em. of Ukrainian History at Harvard and Professor em. of History at the University of Michigan. He is a foreign member of the National Academy of Sciences in Kiev, Ukraine. His research focuses on modern Ukrainian, Russian, and Polish history, and on Marxism and nationalism in Eastern Europe.   Print

  • Charles Taylor

    IWM Permanent Fellow
    Professor em. of Philosophy, McGill University, Montréal
    Read more

  • Maria Teteriuk

    PhD candidate in Mass Communications and senior lecturer in Media Studies, National University of 'Kyiv-Mohyla Academy', Ukraine
    Read more

  • Philipp Ther

    Junior Professor of Polish and Ukrainian Studies, Europa-Universität Frankfurt / Oder
    Read more

  • Maria Todorova

    Professor of History, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign
    Read more

  • Balázs Trencsényi

    Balázs Trencsényi, Ph.D., is Associate Professor at the Department of History, CEU. His research focuses on the comparative history of political thought in East Central Europe and the history of historiography. He is co-director of Pasts, Inc., Center for Historical Studies at CEU and Associate Editor of the periodical East Central Europe (Brill). He was …
    Read more

  • Stefan Troebst

    Read more

  • Marius Turda

    Lecturer in the Education Abroad Program, Eötvös Lorand University, Faculty of Humanities, Budapest
    Read more

  • Andreas Umland

    Andreas Umland ist Wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter am Institut für Euro-Atlantische Kooperation Kiew sowie Herausgeber der Buchreihe Soviet and Post-Soviet Politics and Society, ibidem-Verlag Stuttgart. Print

  • Victoria Vasilenko

    Assistant Professor of Contemporary History and International Relations, Belgorod National Research University
    Read more

  • David G. Victor

    David G. Victor is a Professor at the School of International Relations and Pacific Studies at the University of California, San Diego, where he directs the Laboratory on International Law and Regulation.   Print

  • Harald Welzer

    Harald Welzer ist Forschungsprofessor für Sozialpsychologie an der Universität Witten/Herdecke und Direktor des Center for Interdisciplinary Memory Research am Kulturwissenschaftlichen Instituts Essen.   Print

  • Karolina Wigura

    Adjunct of the History of Ideas, University of Warsaw; Co-Editor of Kultura Liberalna
    Read more

  • Volodymyr Yermolenko

    Volodymyr Yermolenko is a Ukrainian philosopher and essayist. He has a degree in Political Science from the EHESS, Paris, and teaches at Kyiv Mohyla Academy in Kyiv. He is the author of the book Narrator and Philosopher: Walter Benjamin and his time (2011, in Ukrainian). Print

  • Oksana Zabuzhko

    Free-lance writer, Kiev
    Read more

  • Tatiana Zhurzhenko

    IWM Research Director, Russia in Global Dialogue and Ukraine in European Dialogue
    Read more