|
The Post-Coloniality of Asylum Infrastructure
|
|
Seminars and Colloquia
|
Ayşe ÇağlarPaolo Novak
|
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
|
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
|
|
Limits and Divisions of Human Histories
|
|
Lecture
|
Andrzej NowakKatherine YoungerLudger Hagedorn
|
Series: Lecture
The theory of history, as presented by Reinhart Koselleck (1923-2006), offers an intellectually tempting structure of three anthropological distinctions that prescribe figures of all possible histories (individual and collective): sooner or later, inside and outside, above and below. The first one signifies the span between being born and having to die, which makes every life unique and at the same time part of a particular generational experience. It could also be rendered as “old” and “new”. Uses of the second pair might be analysed as a contrast between public and private, or as a contemporary fear stemming from the contrast between “home” and “intruders”. The third pair Andrzej Nowak will try to “translate” not just in “master” and “slave” categories, but rather as “pupil” and “teacher”, or even “therapist” and “patient”. Nowak will try to read Koselleck’s structure in a perspective offered by spatial/temporal concepts of contemporary “Europe in progress” (or “Europe in crisis”), as well as in another, non-political perspective of esthetic renditions of the three above mentioned Koselleck’s abstract pairs ¬ in Andrzej Wajda’s “Birchwood” movie, the last scene of Richard Strauss’s “Rosenkavalier”, and in Philip Larkin’s poem: “An Arundel Tomb”. The question is whether love can be included into these conflicting pairs as a possible factor transcending their structures?
Read more
|
Series: Lecture
The theory of history, as presented by Reinhart Koselleck (1923-2006), offers an intellectually tempting structure of three anthropological distinctions that prescribe figures of all possible histories (individual and collective): sooner or later, inside and outside, above and below. The first one signifies the span between being born and having to die, which makes every life unique and at the same time part of a particular generational experience. It could also be rendered as “old” and “new”. Uses of the second pair might be analysed as a contrast between public and private, or as a contemporary fear stemming from the contrast between “home” and “intruders”. The third pair Andrzej Nowak will try to “translate” not just in “master” and “slave” categories, but rather as “pupil” and “teacher”, or even “therapist” and “patient”. Nowak will try to read Koselleck’s structure in a perspective offered by spatial/temporal concepts of contemporary “Europe in progress” (or “Europe in crisis”), as well as in another, non-political perspective of esthetic renditions of the three above mentioned Koselleck’s abstract pairs ¬ in Andrzej Wajda’s “Birchwood” movie, the last scene of Richard Strauss’s “Rosenkavalier”, and in Philip Larkin’s poem: “An Arundel Tomb”. The question is whether love can be included into these conflicting pairs as a possible factor transcending their structures?
Read more
|
|
The One That Got Away / Everyday Life During Armed Conflicts
|
|
Seminars and Colloquia
|
Dimiter KenarovKeith KrauseLudger HagedornPaweł PieniążekSoli Özel
|
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
|
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
|
|
Junior Visiting Fellows’ Conference Winter 2021
|
|
Conferences and Workshops
|
Ayşe ÇağlarFilip MilačićFrantiška SchormováGeoffrey AungGiorgia DonàJeremy AdelmanKatherine YoungerMallika LeuzingerOksana KlymenkoPavel HorákRuzha SmilovaSebastian HaugTeresa BaronVictoria FominaDoğuş ŞimşekStefan Segi, Julian Strube
|
Series: Conferences and Workshops
|
Series: Conferences and Workshops
|
|
The Precarious Lives of Syrians: Temporary Protection and the Turkey/EU Deal
|
|
Seminars and Colloquia
|
Ayşe ÇağlarFeyzi Baban
|
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
|
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
|
|
The “Sunny” Side Of The Holocaust. Dr. Endre Szántó’s Photo Album From His Forced Labour Service, 1940
|
|
Seminars and Colloquia
|
András LénártLudger HagedornIngo Zechner
|
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
|
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
|
|
Russia’s Foreign Policy After COVID-19: Continuity and Change
|
|
Panels and Discussions
|
Ivan KrastevAndrey Kortunov
|
Series: Panels and Discussions
|
Series: Panels and Discussions
|
|
The Future of Belarus in Europe
|
|
Panels and Discussions
|
Katherine YoungerWojciech PrzybylskiSviatlana Tsikhanouskaya, Christian Ultsch, Franak Viačorka
|
Series: Panels and Discussions
|
Series: Panels and Discussions
|
|
The Death and Rebirth of Democratic Internationalism: Controversies and Possibilities
|
|
Lecture
|
Claus OffeLudger HagedornMicheline Ishay
|
Series: Lecture
|
Series: Lecture
|
|
The Age of Unpeace: How Connectivity Causes Conflict
|
|
Panels and Discussions
|
Ivan KrastevMark Leonard
|
Series: Panels and Discussions
In today’s world, many of the forces that were supposed to bring the world together have ended up driving us apart. Trade, technology, the internet and travel promised to create a global village, but they are also giving countries a reason to fight one another, the opportunity to struggle and an arsenal of new weapons, from cyber-attacks and sanctions to fake news and weaponised vaccines.
Building on the argument from his new book, The Age of Unpeace: How Connectivity Causes Conflict, Mark Leonard, unveils how connectivity has fragmented our societies, politics and made people focus more on what divided them rather than what they hold in common and why this interdependence makes conflict cheaper and more likely in international relations. As the contemporary five big forces driving interdependence – the economy, infrastructure, technology, migration, and international institutions – are being turned into a weapon and change how the topography of power looks like, can we take steps to disarm connectivity and avoid catastrophe?
Read more
|
Series: Panels and Discussions
In today’s world, many of the forces that were supposed to bring the world together have ended up driving us apart. Trade, technology, the internet and travel promised to create a global village, but they are also giving countries a reason to fight one another, the opportunity to struggle and an arsenal of new weapons, from cyber-attacks and sanctions to fake news and weaponised vaccines.
Building on the argument from his new book, The Age of Unpeace: How Connectivity Causes Conflict, Mark Leonard, unveils how connectivity has fragmented our societies, politics and made people focus more on what divided them rather than what they hold in common and why this interdependence makes conflict cheaper and more likely in international relations. As the contemporary five big forces driving interdependence – the economy, infrastructure, technology, migration, and international institutions – are being turned into a weapon and change how the topography of power looks like, can we take steps to disarm connectivity and avoid catastrophe?
Read more
|