David Goodhart:
Dilemmas of Post-liberalism

Political Salon, Mai 2018.

Why do we change our mind about political positions? In his Financial Times article “Why I left my liberal London tribe”, the British public intellectual David Goodhart reflects upon his own trajectory of ideological shift. A left-wing student, he was once a rebel against his bourgeois family background. Later he was the founding editor of the centre-left magazine Prospect. In 2004 his essay “Too diverse?” about the tension between the solidarity-based welfare state and the ever growing diversity in Britain was fiercely attacked by the British left and liberals.

Goodhart’s recent book The Road to Somewhere: The Populist Revolt and the Future of Politics has shaped the British debate on the nature of the current crisis. Should liberals, people from “anywhere” –  cosmopolitan, University-educated, mobile, and uninterested in the others – blame themselves for the state of liberal democracy today, is the question Goodhart asks.

In this Political Salon we attempt a conversation beyond prejudice to enquire into the defining changes that mark our times, their underlying causes, and the state of public discourse in Europe.

David Goodhart is a well known British journalist, political analyst and author, founder and former editor in chief of Prospect magazine. Previously, he was correspondent for the Financial Times, and has written for The Guardian, The Independent and The Times. Former director of Demos think-tank, as of 2017 Goodhart is Head of the Demography, Immigration and Integration Unit at the think tank Policy exchange. His books The British Dream: Successes and Failures of Post-war Immigration (2013) and The Road to Somewhere: The Populist Revolt and the Future of Politics (2017) ) have fueled the polarized and  heated debate in the UK on immigration, the social impact of Globalisation, and populism.

Chairs:
Ivan Krastev
IWM Permanent Fellow, IWM

Christian Ultsch
Head, Foreign Politics Department, Die Presse

In cooperation with the European Network of Houses for Debate “Time to Talk”, Die Presse and with the generously support of OSIFE and EVN

 

 

 

Weekly Focus XI:

Related Posts:

  • Luiza Bialasiewicz, Hanna L. Muehlenhoff:
    ‘Personal sovereignty’ in pandemics: or, why do today’s ‘sovereignists’ reject state sovereignty?

    July 1, 2002
    "The focus on individual agency and responsibility comes, indeed, with the denial of public health as a collective good (and responsibility)" write former IWM Visiting Fellow Luiza Bialasiewicz and Hanna L. Muehlenhoff in their latest article on Open Democracy.
    Read more

  • Stephen Holmes:
    Illiberal Democracy

    Stephen Holmes gave the keynote speech of the conference HUNGARY 2015: Mapping the “System of National Cooperation”, jointly organized by the Central European University (CEU), Pasts, Inc. Center for Historical Studies and the IWM. Putting aside for the moment questions of electoral opportunism, rhetorical posturing, and redistributive cronyism, the lecture will provide a historical and …
    Read more

  • Chantal Mouffe:
    The Affects of Democracy

    In the Patočka Memorial Lecture from 2017, political theorist Chantal Mouffe examines the crucial role played in politics by what she calls ‘passions’ to refer to the common affects that are at stake in the construction of collective identities. Taking her bearings from Spinoza, Freud and Wittgenstein and from the agonistic model of democracy that …
    Read more

  • David Goodhart:
    Dilemmas of Post-liberalism

     Political Salon, Mai 2018. Why do we change our mind about political positions? In his Financial Times article “Why I left my liberal London tribe”, the British public intellectual David Goodhart reflects upon his own trajectory of ideological shift. A left-wing student, he was once a rebel against his bourgeois family background. Later he …
    Read more

  • Jan-Werner Müller:
    Was ist Populismus?

    Vienna Humanities Festival 2016. Jan-Werner Müller lehrt Politische Theorie und Ideengeschichte an der Princeton University und ist derzeit Fellow am Institut für die Wissenschaften vom Menschen (IWM). Er verfasste zentrale Texte über die politischen Theorien des 20. Jahrhunderts. Sein neuestes, viel diskutiertes Buch trägt den Titel Was ist Populismus?. Darin skizziert Müller eine allgemeine Theorie …
    Read more

  • Europa im Diskurs:
    Leben wir im Zeitalter des Populismus?

    Europa im Diskurs, April 2017. Nicht nur in den meisten europäischen Staaten, sondern weltweit befinden sich Populisten und populistische Parteien auf dem Vormarsch, wie auch der Wahlsieg von Donald Trump in den USA zeigt. Diese Entwicklungen werfen Fragen auf: Wann sind Politiker Populisten? Wie wirkt sich ihr Handeln auf demokratische Gesellschaften aus? Wie soll man …
    Read more

  • Jan-Werner Müller:
    We the People – On Populism and Democracy

    IWM Lectures in Human Sciences 2013 Lecture I: What is Populism? “Populism” has become one of the most wide-spread terms of political analysis, especially in Europe.  At the same time, historians, political theorists, and social scientists deeply disagree about the meaning of the concept, with some claiming that there is no such a thing at …
    Read more

  • Populism and the Failure of the Centre Parties

    The revival of rightwing populism is not an isolated development that affects one or a few European countries. Anti-liberal parties of the far right are advancing across Europe-from the Progress Parties in Scandinavia to the Northern League in Italy, not forgetting the many similar parties that exist throughout post-communist Europe. In some countries they are in national government; in others, they are on the margins of power. Either way, they-and not parties of the left or centre-are increasingly shaping the agenda of politics.
    Read more

Articles in Transit and IWMpost