The Return of Geopolitics

Weekly Focus curated by Anita Dick, Marion Gollner and Ludger Hagedorn

We face a complicated, volatile and uncertain geopolitical situation today. The post-Cold War order is over – along with its proclaimed “end of history” and the end of geopolitics. We are once again discussing a politics of national interests and geopolitical spheres of influence (cf. Stephen Kotkin’s groundbreaking IWM lecture on “Sphere of Influence”). How much the geopolitical landscape has changed in recent years, becomes clear by re-reading Robert Cooper’s assessment from 2013, where he bluntly states that “the Cold War is over and Russia is preoccupied with making money.”

The new world order is characterized by a growing geopolitical fluidity and insecurity. The old governance of security is in flux.  Geopolitical rivalries take center stage, while a new security architecture is not in sight. Escalating US-Turkish tensions in recent years, for instance, show how relations between traditional military and political allies are being recalibrated. The new geopolitical landscape is complex and open as it remains unclear which choices countries will make and what resources they will use towards these newly defined ends. Alternative scenarios that were simply unthinkable a few years ago have entered Realpolitik today. In order to map and analyze these new international developments, IWM Permanent Fellow Ivan Krastev initiated in 2018 a series of “Geopolitical Talks” in cooperation with the Austrian Ministry of Defense. We highlight here some of these discussions at the IWM with Robert John Sawers, former chief of the British Secret Intelligence Service (MI6) on Changing Politics and Geopolitics, the former national security advisor to the Prime Minister of India Shivshankar Menon on The New Asian Geopolitics, American policy analyst and government official Wess Mitchell on current geopolitical challenges and lessons from the past, and William Joseph Burns, former career Foreign Service Officer and President of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace on American Diplomacy in a Disordered World.

In addition to the “Geopolitical Talks”, the IWM has organized the “Political Salons” in cooperation with the daily newspaper Die Presse in recent years. A highlight of this  renowned series was undoubtedly the visit of the former US Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, who discussed – together with Gerald Knaus (Europe’s Futures Visiting Fellow) and Christian Ultsch (Die Presse) – the topic of  “Global Responsibility. Europe, the US and the Refugee Crisis“.

New geopolitical claims take place in a multipolar world, a world without an uncontested hegemon. Multilateralism as a principle of international political order is increasingly losing ground. While countries, like the USA and UK, which decisively contributed to the establishment of the global architecture of multilateral governance after 1945 try to shake off its constraints in order to opt for bilateral solutions, other countries, like China, have been the new proponents of multilateral governance. As Mary Kaldor reminds us, if the politics of war is back on the international agenda, it is one of “New Wars” that challenge conventional theorizing (cf. her lecture on “New Wars as a Social Condition).

The new world order is also a post-American one, i.e. a world without a single hegemonic political center. Western liberal democracy has not only lost in attractiveness on a globally as a model but is being seriously challenged within the West as well. Widespread dissatisfaction with neo-liberal economic globalization has fueled the resurgence of nationalisms, albeit often at the expense of liberal principles. Moreover, Russia and China offer two different alternatives to the former hegemonic model of liberalism that may prove to be attractive to political elites and citizens alike in many countries of the world. The geopolitical role of Russia is further complicated by its ambitions in Ukraine. IWM Permanent Fellow Timothy Snyder, a leading expert on the history of the region that he once described as “Bloodlands”, cautions us about these ambitions in a lecture with the title “Ukrainian History as World History”.

One response to these shifts and the “illiberal” turn is denial. Another is to wait for America to return to its liberal self once Trump is out of office. This bet on the illiberal model exhausting itself may be one that will not pay off. There are many reasons to believe that the US is unlikely to embrace with enthusiasm once again its role as the leader of the free world and the guarantor of the liberal system. The effects of these developments on the European Union were the subject of the IWM initiated Debating Europe on “The Return of Geopolitics in Europe”. Although the EU Commission has defined itself as a “geopolitical” one, the EU seems ill prepared to live in a world where geopolitics has returned, i.e. where national governments as well as citizens are obsessed with securing borders and territorial sovereignty. In many parts of the EU national pride seems to gain salience over economic success.

As Stephen Holmes and Ivan Krastev argue in their recent book “The Light that Failed,” (see excerpt IWMpost 124) the supposed end of history turned out to be only the beginning of an Age of Imitation. They argue that right wing populism and xenophobia that challenge liberal democracy in some Eastern European countries stems from a resentment against the demand to become Westernized. Ironically, while just 30 years ago it was expected that the former communist countries would sooner or later start to resemble the United States, it now appears that Putin’s autocratic Russia is the model for the Trump administration.

Weekly Focus II:

Related Posts:

  • William J. Burns:
    American Diplomacy in a Disordered World

    In the fifth event of the series “Geopolitical Talks” IWM Permanent Fellow Ivan Krastev talks with Ambassador William J. Burns, president of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, about America’s changing role in the world and the purpose of American diplomacy. William J. Burns is president of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and the …
    Read more

  • Shivshankar Menon:
    The New Asian Geopolitics

    In the last two decades, globalisation, rapid development and the rise of China and other emerging economies have moved the centre of gravity of the world politics and the economy to Asia. In this talk, Ambassador Menon considers the longer term drivers of this phenomenon and where they might take the geopolitics of Asia in …
    Read more

  • Robert John Sawers:
    Changing Politics and Geopolitics

    President Trump has now survived his first test as US President and, barring serious findings from the Mueller Inquiry, he will run for a second term with reasonable prospects of winning.  Like him or not, he is set to be the most consequential president for fifty years.  An assessment of the implications of a return …
    Read more

  • Timothy Snyder:
    Ukrainian History as World History: 1917-2017

    The main theme of European history in the 20th Century is the transition from empire to integration. Ukraine is the country whose experiences bring together European and global themes that allow us to see this process. 1917 is the year to begin – the anti-colonial revolution that was also a colonial revolution. Timothy Snyder is …
    Read more

  • Debating Europe:
    The Return of Geopolitics in Europe

    After the fall of the Iron Curtain in 1989 and the subsequent reordering of Europe, it seemed that a new era of stable and peaceful development lay ahead. In recent months, however, Europeans have experienced increasing insecurity. Peace and security can no longer be taken for granted. Borders and national entities have been called into …
    Read more

  • Mary Kaldor:
    New Wars as a Social Condition

    Building on her longstanding and groundbreaking research on the “New Wars”, this lecture by Mary Kaldor explained that the difference between old and new wars is not empirical but conceptual. New wars have a different logic from old wars. Old wars  (both inter-state wars and classic civil wars) can be analysed in Clausewitzean terms as …
    Read more

  • Stephen Kotkin:
    Sphere of Influence

    A History of the Present The liberal, rules-based international order did not take shape predominantly as a consequence of highmindedness, but as a sphere of influence.  That, moreover, was to a great extent inspired, and sustained, by a comprehensive cold war with the Soviet Union (or Second World, as it was once called).  The sphere …
    Read more

  • Madeleine Albright:
    Global Responsibility: Europe, the US and the Refugee Crisis

    Madeleine Albright was born in 1937 in Prague. As a child, she moved with her family to the United States. After studying at Wellesley College and Columbia University, Albright entered politics at the urging of a former professor. In 1993, Albright became the American ambassador to the United Nations, and three years later she was …
    Read more

  • Misha Glenny:
    McMafia and the Geopolitics of Crime

     Organized crime is part of all our worlds—often without us even knowing. In our times of the return of geopolitics Misha Glenny renowned author and journalist presents and discusses the deep and intricate connections in the world of international organized crime and how these developments affect today’s politics and societies. Misha Glenny is a …
    Read more

  • The European Union and the Habsburg Monarchy

    The Habsburg Monarchy lasted five centuries. It was both solid and flexible; it aroused genuine affection among its citizens. But it vanished in a puff of smoke. Should we expect the European Union, shallow in history and unloved by those it serves, to do better?
    Read more