Europe’s Other Democracy Problem

The Challenge of Protecting Democracy and the Rule of Law within EU Member States

Peace March for Hungary, 23.10.2013

Not just British Eurosceptics complain incessantly about the EU’s ‘democratic deficit’. Across the continent, European citizens feel that, as the cliché goes, ‘distant and bureaucratic Brussels’ is not democratically accountable. It may turn out that this year’s elections to the European Parliament, for all their faults, were a start in rendering the Union more democratic. However, in this bird’s eye view of the EU’s political problems, a different challenge to democracy in Europe easily gets overlooked: a hollowing-out of democracy and the rule of law within Member States of the Union, or what the American political scientist Dan Kelemen has called ‘Europe’s other democratic deficit’ — with Hungary being deepest in the undemocratic red, so to speak. The EU has proved ill-equipped to deal with this deficit; addressing it should be a priority for the new European Commission headed by Jean-Claude Juncker. Even those loath to increase Brussels’ powers should understand that all Europeans have an interest in preventing the emergence of illiberal ‘rogue states’ in their midst – for as long as such states have a vote in the European Council, they have a say in how all of us Europeans live.

Euroseptics – and, for that matter, many left-wing critics of the EU, joined in a politically somewhat curious chorus – will immediately respond to this political diagnosis that it is Brussels itself that is to blame for a hollowing-out of liberal democracy; hence making the EU meddle even more in the internal affairs of member States is adding insult to injury. After all, have we not learnt during the Eurocrisis that national parliaments would effectively be disempowered by a coalition of the stronger Eurozone members, once the latter had decided to impose austerity measures on Southern Europe? This is a serious issue, to be sure – but the fact is that some of the most dramatic crises of democracy and the rule of law in Europe today are largely home-made, so to speak. Take the example of Hungary: under the leadership of right-wing populist Viktor Orbán and his Fidesz party, the country is experiencing what can only be called a Central European version of Putinism: checks and balances are dismantled (with the independence of the judiciary being curtailed in particular); the state is effectively occupied by one party; the media are brought in line; and much of the economy is handed over to Fidesz-friendly oligarchs. In a speech this July Orbán announced that he has embarked on building an ‘illiberal state’. He also said that the EU could not hinder him. Is he right?

A Politically Helpless Union?

So far, the Union has achieved mixed results at best when dealing with states that appear to be violating Europe’s ‘fundamental values’. Officially, the latter are enshrined in the Lisbon Treaty – or what is now simply called the Treaty on European Union — as ‘respect for human dignity, freedom, democracy, equality, the rule of law and respect for human rights, including the rights of persons belonging to minorities’. And officially, of course, no Member State government opposes such declarations. The devil is in the details, and the European Commission, the designated ‘guardian of the treaties’, can only address such details through demonstrating that a country is infringing EU law. Yet EU law, for the most part, is about the main business of the EU — which is to say: business. Politicians sometimes make it sound as if European integration had been started in the 1950s in order to strengthen democracy after the horrors of totalitarianism and the Second World War. But this is a myth. The internal market was to ensure prosperity and peace by making nation-states highly dependent on each other – so economics was indeed to serve political ends. But in its essence the EU was and remains a market, so much so that EU law, including the most far-reaching decisions by the European Court of Justice, have to be tied back to market-related freedoms, such as freedom of movement to find employment in another Member State.

Conflicts between the European Commission and the Hungarian government in recent years provide a telling example of what this means in practice. In 2011 Fidesz drastically lowered the retirement age of senior judges, with the result that the party could staff the judiciary with loyalists. The Commission took Hungary to the European Court of Justice – charging the government with age discrimination. Brussels eventually won its case, but few judges were re-instated. Discrimination, after all, can be compensated with individual payments. The underlying political problem – a weakening of checks and balances – went unaddressed. Politically, Fidesz got its way.

To be sure, the European Commission is not the only player in this game. Article 7 of the European Treaty provides for an option to suspend the voting rights of a Member State in the European Council, if that Member State is in persistent breach of fundamental European values – according to the judgment of the Commission, the European Parliament and all other Member States. The idea for such an article had in fact been pushed by two paragons of Western European democracy, Italy and Austria, in the run-up to enlargement of the EU to Central and Eastern Europe in 2004. They had been motivated by the fear that those uncouth Eastern Europeans might screw up politically (the irony being that European sanctions – though not under Article 7 – were first applied against Austria in 2000, after Jörg Haider’s far-right Freedom Party had become part of a new governing coalition). Today Article 7 is widely considered a ‘nuclear option’ – a term even used by outgoing Commission President José Manuel Barroso to signal that it is widely deemed unusable. Countries seem simply too scared that sanctions might also be applied against them one day; sometimes regional solidarity (especially in Central and Eastern Europe) also plays a role.

Irrespective of practical obstacles to invoking Article 7, there is an issue with what such sanctions against a Member State actually mean. Taking away voting rights in the European Council is not the same as intervening within the Member State concerned. Rather, the core of Article 7 consists of a mechanism to insulate the rest of the Union from the government of a particular Member State deemed to be in breach of fundamental values; it enables a kind of moral quarantine, not an actual intervention. Other European governments are essentially saying: we want nothing to do with you, as long as we have serious doubts about your government, the way it came to power, and the way it exercises power.

The flip-side of this idea, though – and this is an important lesson for British Eurosceptics of whichever party – is that indifference is not an option. After all, EU law applies across national borders, after having been created by individual Member States acting together. Hence, every European citizen has an interest in not being faced with an illiberal Member State in the EU, since that state will make decisions in the European Council and therefore, at least in an indirect way, govern the lives of all citizens.

Put more bluntly: it may well be true that there are far-away countries containing people about whom we know nothing – but as long as they are in the EU, they do concern us. This fact of interdependence has recently been brought home to Europeans by the Eurocrisis in a very costly manner. But it has mostly been interpreted in financial and economic terms – when, in fact, there is broader political interdependence, too. Given that European integration has always had an ulterior political purpose – as I said above, the market was just the means – the rise of ‘illiberal states’ is a far greater threat to the EU’s foundations than the Eurocrisis.

Is Party Politics the Answer?

One might be tempted to say, then, that a plainly political challenge should be met with a plainly political response. In a sense, Article 7 does fit this requirement – its invocation, if it ever happened, would be based on a distinctly political judgment by EU institutions and a country’s peers in the EU on the country’s democratic performance. But given its seeming ineffectiveness, an alternative would be party politics within and outside EU institutions. After all, it has often been said that the Eurocrisis has brought about the politicization of Europe — and that it is now time for the Europeanization of politics: citizens of many Member States – possibly all Member States — have woken up to the fact that what happens elsewhere in Europe has a direct impact on their lives; what we need, then, are ways to internalize these externalities and reach common European policies that can be justified on the basis of election outcomes across Europe. Hence the call for a genuine European party system or at least a continuation of the Spitzenkandidaten-process (as practiced in this year’s elections to the European Parliament).

Alas, a less desirable effect of such a Europeanisation of politics is also becoming apparent: the conservative European People’s Party (EPP) firmly closed ranks around Orbán, when he was taken to task by the Commission; on the other side of the political spectrum, Martin Schulz, President of the European Parliament and one of Orbán’s most outspoken critics, defended his fellow Social Democrat Victor Ponta in Bucharest — at least initially — when Ponta was rightly criticized in 2012 for disempowering the Romanian Constitutional Court and trying to rig a vote to impeach the president, a political opponent of Ponta.

To be sure, partisanship might not always trump all other considerations: Slovakia’s arch-populist leader Robert Fico was temporarily ostracized by his fellow European Social Democrats; and it seems that in the European Parliament at least some members of the European People’s Party chose not to oppose the 2013 ‘Tavares Report’ that called for continuous political monitoring of Hungary, enabling the adoption of the Report in an assembly in which the center-right had a clear majority. Yet in spring 2014 the then president of the EPP, Joseph Daul, was actually campaigning for ‘mon cher ami Victor Orbán’ on Budapest’s Heroes’ Square in the run-up to the Hungarian national elections. Talk of sanctioning Fidesz in the EPP or even expelling it altogether ceased abruptly. Daul went on to congratulate Orbán on his election victory at the beginning of April – and added that the latter had always spoken the truth to the Hungarian people (which, among many other curious utterances by Orbán, would have included the ‘truth’ of comparing Brussels to the Soviet Union, the Habsburg Empire and the Ottomans – all oppressors of the freedom-loving Magyars). The lesson from this story is sobering: vectors for democracy point in two different directions at the supranational and at the national level respectively. The Lisbon Treaty effectively gave the Parliament the power to appoint the next Commission President; but one consequence is that the party groups now really need every vote they can get. Party size and discipline will trump political ethics.

A Proposal

So how could the EU deal with challenges to liberal democracy more effectively? First of all, Article 7 ought to be extended. There might be situations where democracy is not just slowly undermined or partially dismantled – but where the entire edifice of democratic institutions is blown up, so to speak (think of a military coup). In such an extreme case, the Union ought to have the option of expelling a Member State. Under current law, states may decide to leave voluntarily (though, as the UK might find out, this is still a lengthy, drawn-out process) – but there is no legal mechanism for actually removing a country from the Union. In that sense, thete is a basic contradiction in the European polity as it has evolved up until now: every political community either has instruments for internal intervention or something like a right to expel one of its parts. At the moment, the EU has neither.

But then, short of military coups, who and what decides whether a Member State is violating fundamental values? We need what one might call an agent of credible legal-political judgment as to whether a country is seriously departing from the main, fairly broad road of liberal democratic institutions and practices in the EU a task which is different both from narrowly assessing compliance with EU law and from ascertaining belief in values (whatever the latter might mean concretely anyway: a Committee on UnEuropean Beliefs and Activities in the European Parliament?). Technical-legal judgment of rule compliance in and of itself is insufficient; and philosophical consensus about values is not really the issue (all governments, after all, continue to profess faith in democracy and the rule of law).

Making such a comprehensive judgment about a whole political system might at first sight seem impossible: do European really agree on fundamental values mean in practice? Is the EU not also committed to respecting the ‘national identities’ of its Member States? Do legitimate national differences in how the parameters of politics are understood not matter? Is such political policing by Brussels, from Lapland to Lampedusa, not rightly the stuff of Eurosceptic’s worst nightmares? Yes – but: the EU is already making precisely such comprehensive judgments every single time it decides whether a country is ready to accede to the Union. Every club checks out its prospective members – there is nothing strange about also wanting to know how members inside the club are behaving. The real question is not whether one can judge, or whether one should judge. The question is: who’s to judge?

At first sight, the most plausible answer would seem to be: a European Commission with more powers. But there is a problem with the idea of the Commission as an agent of impartial legal-political judgment, one that could become acute in the near future. Many proposals to increase the legitimacy of the Commission contain the suggestion purposefully to politicize the Commission: ideas to elect the President directly or to make the Commissioners into a kind of politically uniform cabinet government all would render the body more partisan – a process which arguably has already begun with Juncker’s election this year. The partisanship is well-intentioned, of course – it is meant to make the EU more democratic. But a side-effect is that the Commission loses credibility as an agent of impartial judgment.

An alternative to the Commission undertaking the task of monitoring – and, if necessary, sanctioning – Member States would be to delegate it to another institution, such as the EU’s Fundamental Rights Agency in Vienna. My preferred outcome would be a new body modeled to some extent on the Council of Europe’s ‘Venice Commission’ (whose official name is European Commission for Democracy through Law), which advises on constitution-making in European Council Member States. An EU-specific democracy watchdog might be called a ‘Copenhagen Commission’, as a reminder of the ‘Copenhagen criteria’ of democracy and respect for human rights that prospective Member States had to fulfill before they could join the EU. Such a Commission should be staffed with legal experts (comparative constitutionalists in particular) as well as elder stateswomen and statesmen with a proven track record of political judgment. They should loosely monitor developments in the EU, drawing on help from the European Commission, the Fundamental Rights Agency and other bodies, as they see fit.

The real question is of course: and then what? The Copenhagen Commission should, I think, be empowered to investigate a situation in potential ‘rogue states’ and then trigger a mechanism that sends a clear signal (not just words), but far short of the measures envisaged in Article 7. Following the advice of the Copenhagen Commission, the European Commission could be required to cut subsidies for infrastructure projects, for instance, or impose significant fines. Especially the former might prove to be effective, if the EU budget as such were to be significantly increased in future years (a measure included in many proposals to tackle the Eurocrisis).

At the same time, all the existing tools would remain in place: Member States could vote on Article 7, and the Commission could keep taking a Member State to the European Court for infringement of the treaties. Also, nothing prevents politicians from having a serious word with one of their peers in another Member State (behind closed doors, if they prefer), when they worry that the country in question is leaving the broad European road of liberal democracy. And, lest anyone think all these approaches suggested here too elite-driven, legalistic or bureaucratic: nothing prevents civil society organizations from mobilizing across borders against a rogue government; and nothing prevents individual citizens from starting a ‘European Citizen’s Initiative’ (a novelty in EU law – with a rather high hurdle of one million signatures, though).

Still, there is an obvious worry here: would sanctions not create a nationalist backlash and thereby actually help populist politicians? This question is more complicated than it might seem. First, for Europe to try to ‘hold back’ or try to be ‘neutral’ in highly charged domestic conflicts is not costless and, in the end, actually also not really ‘neutral’. A reluctance to try to protect liberal democracy in a Member State will betray the hopes of all those citizens of the country in question who did put their trust in the Union as some sort of guarantor against new forms of illiberalism or outright authoritarianism. Moreover, any political actor eager to dismantle checks and balances, for instance, will on some level know that they are heading for a conflict with European institutions – hence they have every incentive to whip up Eurosceptic sentiments as soon as possible, whether the EU actually does very much or not. In other words, pre-emptive nationalism is likely to rear its ugly head in any case.

Second, there is little evidence that any such nationalist campaigns have worked, or, for that matter, that strong exercises of EU leverage before a country’s accession to the EU have produced any severe backlashes. Orbán’s self-declared ‘war of independence’, or so polls suggest, has not proven popular. Few members of a club really want to be seen as seriously misbehaving all the time, and especially in the newer EU Member States, there is still a sense that getting into the Union was a major historical achievement which should not be jeopardized.

How likely is such a Copenhagen Commission? Of course, as of now, David Cameron is holding all of Europe hostage: nobody wants to open the question of treaty change, as long as the British prime minister will use any negotiations to blackmail other EU Members into concessions for the UK. But sooner or later treaty change will be on the agenda again – and at that point European elites should remember that we now, after Hungary, know that serious threats to liberal democracy within a Member State are a real possibility. Establishing a Copenhagen Commission would be an important step in combating them.


Jan-Werner Mueller
is Professor of Politics at Princeton University and a former Visiting Fellow at the Institute for Human Sciences in Vienna. He is the author of Contesting Democracy: Political Ideas in Twentieth-Century Europe (Yale University Press, 2011).

First published by Juncture on September 16, 2014

© Author / Juncture

Tr@nsit Online Authors

  • Bradley F. Abrams

    History, Stanford University
    Read more

  • Thomas Ahbe

    Thomas Ahbe studierte Philosophie, Ökonomie und Soziologie. Seit 1998 wirkt er freischaffend als Sozialwissenschaftler und Publizist. Seine Arbeitsschwerpunkte sind Diskurs- und Kulturgeschichte der deutschen Zweistaatlichkeit und der ostdeutschen Transformation sowie die Generationengeschichte der DDR und Ostdeutschlands.   Print

  • Karl Aiginger

    Karl Aiginger is Director of WIFO (Österreichisches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung), Professor of Economics and Coordinator of the project A new growth path for Europe within the 7th European Framework Program.   Print

  • Sorin Antohi

    Sorin Antohi is Professor of History at Central European University, Budapest.   Print

  • Timothy Garton Ash

    History, Oxford
    Read more

  • Roumen Avramov

    Program director for economic research at the Center for Liberal Strategies, Sofia
    Read more

  • Adam Baczko

    PhD Candidate in Political Science, EHESS, Paris
    Read more

  • Pavel Barsa

    Associate Professor of Political Science, Charles University Prague
    Read more

  • Rainer Bauböck

    Rainer Bauböck is professor of social and political theory at the European University Institute in Florence. In 2006 he was awarded the Latsis Prize of the European Science Foundation for his work on immigration and social cohesion in modern societies. Among his many publications are Immigration and Boundaries of Citizenship (1992), Transnational Citizenship: Membership and …
    Read more

  • Steven Beller

    Geschichte, Cambridge
    Read more

  • Naja Bentzen

    Freelance journalist, Wien
    Read more

  • Luiza Bialasiewicz

    Jean Monnet Professor of EU External Relations, University of Amsterdam
    Read more

  • Muriel Blaive

    Muriel Blaive ist seit 2012 Institutskoordinatorin des Ludwig Boltzmann Instituts für Europäische Geschichte und Öffentlichkeit.   Print

  • Andras Bozoki

    Sociology, Budapest
    Read more

  • José Casanova

    Professor für Soziologie, New School for Social Research, New York
    Read more

  • Daniel Chirot

    Soziologie, Seattle
    Read more

  • Robert Cooper

    Robert Cooper ist britischer Diplomat und derzeit als Sonderberater des Europäischen Auswärtigen Dienstes (European External Action Service, EEAS) tätig. Er ist zudem Gründungsmitglied des European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR).   Print

  • Peter Demetz

    Sterling Professor Emeritus of German and Comparative Literature, Yale University; Korrespondierendes Mitglied des IWM
    Read more

  • James Dodd

    Associate Professor of Philosophy, New School for Social Research, New York
    Read more

  • Martin Endreß

    Martin Endreß ist Professor für Soziologie an der Universität Trier.   Print

  • Mischa Gabowitsch

    Mischa Gabowitsch (gabowitsch.net) is a research fellow at the Einstein Forum in Potsdam. He is the author of Putin kaputt!? (Suhrkamp, 2013), a study of the 2011-13 Russian protests for fair elections, and maintains protestrussia.net, which collects academic resources for the study of protest in Russia.   Print

  • Charles Gati

    Charles Gati is Senior Acting Director of Russian and Eurasian Studies and Foreign Policy Institute Senior Fellow at the School of Advanced International Studies at the Johns Hopkins University, Washington, D.C.     Print

  • Dessy Gavrilova

    Dessy Gavrilova is the founding Director of The Red House – Center for Culture and Debate in Sofia, Bulgaria.     Print

  • Keith Gessen

    Keith Gessen is a freelance writer living in Cambridge, MA.   Print

  • Gerhard Gnauck

    Warsaw correspondent for Die Welt
    Read more

  • Katya Gorchinskaya

    Managing Editor for Investigative Programming, Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (REF/RL), Kyiv
    Read more

  • John Gray

    John Gray is Professor of European Thought at the London School of Economics.   Print

  • Rainer Gries

    Rainer Gries lehrt und forscht als Universitätsprofessor am Historischen Institut der Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, am Institut für Publizistik- und Kommunikationswissenschaft der Universität Wien sowie an der Sigmund Freud PrivatUniversität Wien. Zu seinen Forschungsschwerpuntken zählen u.a. die Gesellschaftsgeschichte Deutschlands und Österreichs im 20. Jahrhundert und die Geschichte des Konsums in Europa.   Print

  • Eva Hahn

    Geschichte
    Read more

  • Gábor Halmai

    Professor of Law, Department of European Studies; Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest
    Read more

  • Elemer Hankiss

    Professor für Politikwissenschaft, Eötvös Lorand Universität, Budapest; Korrespondierendes Mitglied des IWM
    Read more

  • Miklós Haraszti

    Miklós Haraszti is a writer, journalist, human rights advocate and university professor. He served the maximum of two terms as the OSCE Representative on Freedom of the Media from 2004 to 2010. Currently he is Adjunct Professor at the School of International and Public Affairs of Columbia Law School, New York. Haraszti studied philosophy and …
    Read more

  • Sabine Hark

    Sabine Hark forscht an der Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Universität Potsdam, Professur für Frauenforschung.   Print

  • Annemieke Hendriks

    Freelance journalist, Berlin
    Read more

  • Charles Hirschman

    Charles Hirschman is Boeing International Professor at the Department of Sociology and the Daniel J. Evans School of Public Affairs, Washington University.     Print

  • Jennifer L. Hochschild

    Jennifer L. Hochschild is Professor of Government at the John F. Kennedy School of Government, and Professor of African and African-American Studies at the Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Harvard University.   Print

  • Yaroslav Hrytsak

    History, Central European University Budapest
    Read more

  • Richard Hyman

    Richard Hyman ist Professor für Politikwissenschaft an der London School of Economics.   Print

  • Vladislav Inozemtsev

    Professor of Economics at Higher School of Economics; Director, Centre for Post-Industrial Studies, Moscow
    Read more

  • Bruce P. Jackson

    Bruce P. Jackson is the founder and President of the Project on Transitional Democracies. The Project is a multi-year endeavour aimed at accelerating the pace of reform in post-1989 democracies and advancing the date for the integration of these democracies into the institutions of the Euro-Atlantic. Jackson has written extensively about the engagement of Russia …
    Read more

  • Tom Junes

    Visiting Researcher, Warsaw University, and Visiting Lecturer in Polish history, KULeuven, Belgium
    Read more

  • Alex J. Kay

    Alex J. Kay holds a PhD in History from the Humboldt University Berlin.   Print

  • Anatoly M. Khazanov

    Anatoly M. Khazanov ist Professor für Anthropologie an der University of Wisconsin, Madison.   Print

  • Cornelia Klinger

    Professor of Philosophy, University of Tübingen
    Read more

  • Gudrun-Axeli Knapp

    Professor of Social Sciences and Social Psychology, University of Hannover
    Read more

  • Jacek Kochanowicz

    Jacek Kochanowicz is Professor for Economic History at Warsaw University.       Print

  • Michal Kopecek

    International Relations, Charles University Prague
    Read more

  • János Kornai

    János Kornai is Prof. em. for Economics  at Harvard University and Permanent Fellow at the Collegium Budapest – Institute for Advanced Study. He is a member of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences and the Academia Europeae, and Foreign Member of the American, British, Bulgarian, Finnish, Russian and Swedish Academies. He has served as President of …
    Read more

  • Pavel Kouba

    Professor für Philosophie an der Karlsuniversität, Prag; Leiter des Zentrums für Phänomenologische Forschung an der Tschechischen Akademie der Wissenschaften
    Read more

  • János Mátyás Kovács

    IWM Permanent Fellow
    Lecturer, Department of Economics, Eötvös Lorand University, Budapest
    Read more

  • Ivan Krastev

    IWM Permanent Fellow
    Chair of the Board, Centre for Liberal Strategies, Sofia
    Read more

  • Yustyna Kravchuk

    PhD candidate in Film and Media Studies, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv
    Read more

  • Jacek Kucharczyk

    Jacek Kucharczyk ist Head of Programs am Institute of Public Affairs in Warschau.   Print

  • Aleksander Kwasniewski

    Aleksander Kwasniewski war Präsident Polens. Seine Amtszeit verlief von 1995 bis 2005 über zwei Legislaturperioden.   Print

  • Mladen Lazic

    Professor of Sociology, University of Belgrade
    Read more

  • Claus Leggewie

    Professor für Politikwissenschaft, Justus-Liebig-Universität Giessen
    Read more

  • André Liebich

    Honorary Professor of International History and Politics, Graduate Institute, Geneva
    Read more

  • Burkhard Liebsch

    Burkhard Liebsch ist Professor für Philosophie an der Ruhr-Universität Bochum.   Print

  • Michal Luczewski

    Ph.D. candidate in Sociology, Warsaw University
    Read more

  • Charles S. Maier

    Charles S. Maier ist Direktor des Center for European Studies, Harvard University.   Print

  • Andrey Makarychev

    Andrey Makarychev ist Professor und Research Fellow am Institut Osteuropäische Studien an der Freien Universität Berlin.   Print

  • Michał Maciej Matlak

    Ph.D. candidate, Department of Political and Social Sciences, European University Institute, Florence

    Józef Tischner Junior Visiting Fellow (July – December 2016)
    Read more

  • Erik Meyer

    Erik Meyer ist seit 2000 wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter am Sonderforschungsbereich ‘Erinnerungskulturen’ an der Justus-Liebig Universität Gießen.   Print

  • Krzysztof Michalski

    IWM Founding Rector
    Read more

  • Hans J. Misselwitz

    Hans-Jürgen Misselwitz ist ein deutscher SPD-Politiker und Gründungsmitglied des Instituts Solidarische Moderne.   Print

  • Alessandro Monsutti

    Alessandro Monsutti is an associate professor of anthropology and development sociology at the Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies in Geneva, as well as research associate at the Refugee Studies Centre at the University of Oxford. He worked as a consultant for several nongovernmental and international organizations, icnluding UNHCR. His book War and Migration: Social Networks …
    Read more

  • Jan-Werner Mueller

    Professor of Politics, Princeton University; Founding Director, Project in the History of Political Thought
    Read more

  • Rainer Münz

    Professor für Bevölkerungswissenschaft, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin; Korrespondierendes Mitglied des IWM
    Read more

  • Sighard Neckel

    Professor of Sociology, Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt am Main
    Read more

  • Katherine Newman

    Katherine S. Newman is the James B. Knapp Dean of The Zanvyl Krieger School of Arts and Sciences. She is a widely published expert on poverty and the working poor who led major interdisciplinary initiatives at Princeton and Harvard universities.     Print

  • Pierre Nora

    Pierre Nora lehrt Geschichte an der École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales (EHESS) in Paris.   Print

  • Tereza Novotna

    Political Science, Boston University
    Read more

  • Ewald Nowotny

    Ewald Nowotny is Governor of the Austrian National Bank.   Print

  • Thomas Nowotny

    Thomas Nowotny teaches Political Science at the University of Vienna. He has been Austrian diplomat, private secretary to Austrian Chancellor Bruno Kreisky, senior political counselor to the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, and consultant to the OECD.   Print

  • Vlad Odobescu

    Freelance journalist, Romanian Centre for Investigative Journalism, Bucharest
    Read more

  • Andrzej Paczkowski

    Professor für Geschichte, Institut für Politische Studien, Polnische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Warschau
    Read more

  • Emilia Palonen

    Politics, University of Essex
    Read more

  • Irina Papkova

    Irina Papkova is a Research Fellow of Georgetown University’s Berkley Center for Religion, Peace, and World Affairs. She spent five years teaching at the Department of International Relations and European Studies at Central European University, Budapest.   Print

  • Agnieszka Pasieka

    Ph.D. in Social Anthropology from the Martin Luther University, Halle/Saale
    Read more

  • Gleb Pavlovsky

    President, Center of Effective Policies; Member, Public Chamber of the Russian Federation; Editor-in-Chief, The Russian Journal (Moscow)
    Read more

  • György Péteri

    Professor of Contemporary European History, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim
    Read more

  • Tanja Petrovic

    Tanja Petrovic works at the Scientific Research Center of the Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Ljubljana.   Print

  • David Petruccelli

    PhD candidate in History, Yale University
    Read more

  • Alexander von Plato

    Alexander von Plato ist ein deutscher Philosoph und Historiker. Er gründete das Instituts für Geschichte und Biographie an der Fernuniversität Hagen, das er bis 2007 leitete. Von 1996 bis 2000 war er Sekretär der International Oral History Association, von 2006 bis 2008 deren Vizepräsident. Er ist Mitherausgeber und Redakteur von BIOS – Zeitschrift für Biographieforschung, Oral …
    Read more

  • Andrei Plesu

    Andrei Plesu ist Rektor des New Europe College, Bukarest. 1989- 1991 war er rumänischer Kulturminister und 1997- 1999 rumänischer Außenminister.   Print

  • Martin Pollack

    Martin Pollack, geb. 1944 in OÖ, studierte Slawistik und osteuropäische Geschichte. Er war von 1987 bis 1998 Redakteur des “Spiegel” in Warschau und Wien und lebt heute als Schriftsteller und literarischer Übersetzer in Wien und Bocksdorf im Südburgenland. 2011 erhielt er den Leipziger Buchpreis zur Europäischen Verständigung und 2012 den Stanislaw-Vincenz-Preis. Zuletzt erschien von ihm …
    Read more

  • Krzysztof Pomian

    Krzysztof Pomian is Professor of History at the Nicolaus Copernicus University (Toruń) and Academic Director of the Museum of Europe in Brussels.   Print

  • Romano Prodi

    Romano Prodi war von September 1999 bis November 2004 Präsident der Europäischen Kommission.   Print

  • Lipin Ram

    PhD candidate and teaching assistant in Anthropology and Sociology of Development, Graduate Institute, Geneva
    Read more

  • Mykola Riabchuk

    Senior Research Fellow, Institute of Political and Nationalities’ Studies, Academy of Sciences, Kyiv
    Read more

  • Edelbert Richter

    Edelbert Richter ist deutscher Theologe, Politiker und war Mitglied des Deutschen Bundestages.   Print

  • Paul Ricoeur

    Paul Ricoeur ist Philosoph und war Professor Emeritus an der University of Chicago und an der Sorbonne. Er war Mitglied der Académie Francaise und Mitglied des Wissenschaftlichen Beirats des IWM. Er starb 2005.   Print

  • Michel Rocard

    Michel Rocard, former First Secretary of the French Socialist Party and a member of the European Parliament for 15 years, was Prime Minister of France from 1988 to 1991.   Print

  • Akos Rona-Tas

    Akos Rona-Tas is professor at the Sociology Department of the University of California, San Diego and a research associate at Met@risk, INRA, Paris. He is the author of the books Plastic Money: Constructing Markets for Credit Cards in Eight Postcommunist Countries (with Alya Guseva, 2014) and Surprise of the Small Transformation: Demise of Communism and …
    Read more

  • Lew Rubinstein

    Lew Rubinstein lebt als Poet und Essayist in Moskau. Nach dem Studium der Philologie war er als Bibliothekar tätig. Seit Ende der 1960er-Jahre verfasst er poetische Arbeiten, seit 1974 serielle Textzyklen als so genannte Kartotheken. Zusammen mit Andrej Monastyrskij, Dimitrij A. Prigov und Vladimir Sorokin gilt er als wichtigster Vertreter des Moskauer Konzeptualismus. Print

  • Jacques Rupnik

    Geschichte und Politikwissenschaft, Paris
    Read more

  • Claudia Šabi?

    Claudia Šabi? ist Politikwissenschaftlerin und Ethnologin. Seit 1998 ist sie Wissenschaftliche Mitarbeiterin an der Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt am Main. Print

  • Ranabir Samaddar

    Ranabir Samaddar is the Director of the Calcutta Research Group. His research focuses on migration and refugee studies, the theory and practices of dialogue, nationalism and post-colonial statehood in South Asia, and new regimes of technological restructuring and labour control. Among his many publications are Marginal Nation: Trans-border Migration from Bangladesh to India (1999), Politics of Dialogue: Living under …
    Read more

  • Paul Sanders

    Paul Sanders is a historian and management scholar. He is a full-time professor at Reims Management School in Reims, France. He has published across the disciplines of history, international relations and leadership.   Print

  • Karl Schlögel

    Karl Schlögel war Professor für Osteuropäische Geschichte zuerst an der Universität Konstanz, dann an der Europa-Universität Viadrina in Frankfurt/Oder. Nach seiner Emeritierung arbeitet er an einer Archäologie des Kommunismus und einer Geschichte des Wolgaraumes. Zurzeit ist er City of Vienna/IFK Fellow am IFK in Wien.     Print

  • Thomas Schmid

    Thomas Schmid is the publisher of the WELT Group, Berlin. He worked for various newspapers, among them as editor of the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung and the Frankfurter Allgemeine Sonntagszeitung. From 2006 to 2010 he was Editor-in-Chief of Die Welt.   Print

  • Margit Schratzenstaller

    Margit Schratzenstaller is senior researcher at the Austrian Institute of Economic Research (WIFO) and is currently coordinating (together with Karl Aiginger and Stefan Ederer) ‘WWW for Europe’, a 4-year research project within the 7th Framework Program funded by the European Commission.   Print

  • Dieter Segert

    Dieter Segert ist Professor für Transformationsprozesse in Mittel-, Südost- und Osteuropa am Institut für Politikwissenschaft der Universität Wien. Seit September 2007 ist er Mitglied des Vorstandes des IDM Wien, seit Juni 2008 Mitglied der Leibniz-Sozietät der Wissenschaften zu Berlin.   Print

  • Victoriya Sereda

    Sociologie, Ivan-Franko-Universität, Lviv
    Read more

  • Michel Serres

    Michel Serres ist Philosoph und Mitglied der Académie Française.   Print

  • Marci Shore

    Associate Professor of History, Yale University

    Visiting Fellow
    (May - July 2016)
    Read more

  • Sławomir Sierakowski

    Director, Institute for Advanced Study, Warsaw; Founder, "Krytyka Polityczna" movement
    Read more

  • Sara Silverstein

    Ph.D. Candidate in Modern European and International History, Yale University
    Read more

  • Aleksander Smolar

    Political Science, Paris
    Read more

  • Timothy Snyder

    IWM Permanent Fellow
    Bird White Housum Professor of History, Yale University
    Read more

  • George Soros

    George Soros is a pioneer of the hedge-fund industry, investor and philanthropist, he is the author of many books, including Financial Turmoil in Europe and the United States: Essays (2012), The Soros Lectures: At the Central European University (2010), The Crash of 2008 and What it Means: The New Paradigm for Finance Markets (2009).   …
    Read more

  • Robert Spaemann

    Robert Spaemann ist Professor em. für Philosophie an der Universität München.   Print

  • Pawel Spiewak

    Associate Professor of Sociology, Department of Sociology and Philosophy, Warsaw University
    Read more

  • Wilfried Stadler

    Wilfried Stadler ist Unternehmensberater, Wirtschaftspublizist und Honorarprofessor an der Wirtschaftsuniversität Wien. Bis 2009 war er Vorstandsvorsitzender einer österreichischen Spezialbank für Unternehmensfinanzierung.   Print

  • Rudolf Stamm

    Rudolf Stamm war von 1975 bis 1988 Korrespondent der Neuen Zürcher Zeitung für Osteuropa und Österreich, anschließend bis 1999 für Italien, dann bis zu seiner Pensionierung 2002 für die USA mit Sitz in Washington D.C. Er starb 2010 in der Schweiz. 1985 erscheinen seine NZZ-Reportagen aus Osteuropa in dem Band Alltag und Tradition in Osteuropa. …
    Read more

  • Paul Starr

    Paul Starr ist Professor für Soziologie an der Princeton University und Mitherausgeber von The American Prospect. Er ist Pulitzer-Preisträger.   Print

  • Martina Steer

    ÖAW APART Fellow (History)
    Read more

  • Kristina Stoeckl

    Research Director
    APART Fellow, Austrian Academy of Sciences; Department of Political Sciences, University of Vienna
    Read more

  • Roman Szporluk

    Roman Szporluk is Professor em. of Ukrainian History at Harvard and Professor em. of History at the University of Michigan. He is a foreign member of the National Academy of Sciences in Kiev, Ukraine. His research focuses on modern Ukrainian, Russian, and Polish history, and on Marxism and nationalism in Eastern Europe.   Print

  • Charles Taylor

    IWM Permanent Fellow
    Professor em. of Philosophy, McGill University, Montréal
    Read more

  • Maria Teteriuk

    PhD candidate in Mass Communications and senior lecturer in Media Studies, National University of 'Kyiv-Mohyla Academy', Ukraine
    Read more

  • Philipp Ther

    Junior Professor of Polish and Ukrainian Studies, Europa-Universität Frankfurt / Oder
    Read more

  • Maria Todorova

    Professor of History, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign
    Read more

  • Balázs Trencsényi

    Balázs Trencsényi, Ph.D., is Associate Professor at the Department of History, CEU. His research focuses on the comparative history of political thought in East Central Europe and the history of historiography. He is co-director of Pasts, Inc., Center for Historical Studies at CEU and Associate Editor of the periodical East Central Europe (Brill). He was …
    Read more

  • Stefan Troebst

    .
    Read more

  • Marius Turda

    Lecturer in the Education Abroad Program, Eötvös Lorand University, Faculty of Humanities, Budapest
    Read more

  • Andreas Umland

    Andreas Umland ist Wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter am Institut für Euro-Atlantische Kooperation Kiew sowie Herausgeber der Buchreihe Soviet and Post-Soviet Politics and Society, ibidem-Verlag Stuttgart. Print

  • Victoria Vasilenko

    Assistant Professor of Contemporary History and International Relations, Belgorod National Research University
    Read more

  • David G. Victor

    David G. Victor is a Professor at the School of International Relations and Pacific Studies at the University of California, San Diego, where he directs the Laboratory on International Law and Regulation.   Print

  • Harald Welzer

    Harald Welzer ist Forschungsprofessor für Sozialpsychologie an der Universität Witten/Herdecke und Direktor des Center for Interdisciplinary Memory Research am Kulturwissenschaftlichen Instituts Essen.   Print

  • Karolina Wigura

    Adjunct of the History of Ideas, University of Warsaw; Co-Editor of Kultura Liberalna
    Read more

  • Volodymyr Yermolenko

    Volodymyr Yermolenko is a Ukrainian philosopher and essayist. He has a degree in Political Science from the EHESS, Paris, and teaches at Kyiv Mohyla Academy in Kyiv. He is the author of the book Narrator and Philosopher: Walter Benjamin and his time (2011, in Ukrainian). Print

  • Oksana Zabuzhko

    Free-lance writer, Kiev
    Read more

  • Tatiana Zhurzhenko

    Research Director, Russia in Global Dialogue / Ukraine in European Dialogue
    Read more